At 08:29 AM 9/13/2009 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
> http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as "under
> consideration", but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
> has been deferred.
This isn't really contradictory. "
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/9/13 Darren Dale :
>>> If Phillip doesn't respond here, you may want to ask him directly.
>>> My impression is that it is deferred because nobody is pursuing it
>>> actively (including Phillip Eby). It's common for a PEP to be in
2009/9/13 Darren Dale :
>> If Phillip doesn't respond here, you may want to ask him directly.
>> My impression is that it is deferred because nobody is pursuing it
>> actively (including Phillip Eby). It's common for a PEP to be in that
>> state for several years, "deferred" then is an indication t
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:29 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
>> http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as "under
>> consideration", but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
>> has been deferred.
>
> This isn't
> Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
> http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as "under
> consideration", but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
> has been deferred.
This isn't really contradictory. "under consideration" means "in
progress": it has neith
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> I would be very interested in seeing a framework for generic functions
> in the numpy standard library.
Sorry, I meant to say "python standard library"
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.o
Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as "under
consideration", but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
has been deferred.
I was reading through the discussion on the python-3000 mailing list
archive, and at one point s
