Yes, you are completely right. I ended up realizing that a change like
this would break almost all third-party extension.
But... What about of doing this for Py3K? Third-party extension have
to be fixed anyway.
On 10/1/07, Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 20
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:09:54PM +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> What's wrong with
>
> static const char *kwlist[] = {"x", "base", 0};
The following goes wrong if we try again to walk this path:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060689.html
Armin
> I'm trying to build Python (2.6) with GCC the option -Wwrite-strings.
>
> 1 - Is there any interest on this?
It might be nice to have, but will certainly come at a cost. So feel
free to try this out; at the end, we might agree that this change is
too intrusive.
> 2 - What should I do for the v
I'm trying to build Python (2.6) with GCC the option -Wwrite-strings.
1 - Is there any interest on this?
2 - What should I do for the very common (taken from int_new):
static char *kwlist[] = {"x", "base", 0};
I was able to remove all the warning in Objects/*, except those related to (2).
-
