[Python-Dev] Buildbot UI auto-refreshes

2021-03-21 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, It seems the buildbot Web UI has the bad habit of auto-refreshing itself (by doing a full page reload) every minute or two. I also couldn't find a setting to disable it (despite being logged in). Am I missing something? Regards Antoine. __

[Python-Dev] Buildbot migrated to a new server

2020-09-03 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, tl; dr Buildbots were unstable for 3 weeks but the issue is mostly resolved. Since last January, the disk of the buildbot server was full every 2 weeks and The Night’s Watch had to fix it in the darkness for you (usually, remove JUnit files and restart the server). The old machine only has 8

[Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2019-09-13 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Many buildbot workers failed in the last 48 hours, it's likely related to higher activity caused by the core dev sprint currently running at London. Here are failures in random order. Can someone please have a look? I suggest to add comments to issues for collaboration. test__xxsubinterprete

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report, August 2017

2017-08-19 Thread Brett Cannon
Thanks for all of this, Victor! On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, 09:38 Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a quick report of what changed recently on buildbots. > > > == pythoninfo == > > I added a new "python3 -m test.pythoninfo" command which is now run on > Travis CI, AppVeyor and buildbots. > >

[Python-Dev] Buildbot report, August 2017

2017-08-18 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Here is a quick report of what changed recently on buildbots. == pythoninfo == I added a new "python3 -m test.pythoninfo" command which is now run on Travis CI, AppVeyor and buildbots. https://bugs.python.org/issue30871 This command dumps various informations to help debugging test fa

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-07-04 Thread Victor Stinner
2017-06-29 17:09 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but, for the first time, *all reference > leaks* have been fixed on *all branches* (2.7, 3.5, 3.6 and master), > on *Linux and Windows*! Before, we mostly focused on the master branch > (called "default" in Mercurial) on Linux.

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-30 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/29/2017 5:34 PM, Rob Boehne wrote: Hello, I¹m new to the list, and contributing to Python specifically, and I¹m interested in getting master and 3.6 branches building and working ³better² on UNIX. I¹ve been looking at a problem building 3.6 on HP-UX and see a PR was merged into master, http

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Rob Boehne
Hello, I¹m new to the list, and contributing to Python specifically, and I¹m interested in getting master and 3.6 branches building and working ³better² on UNIX. I¹ve been looking at a problem building 3.6 on HP-UX and see a PR was merged into master, https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1351 an

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Victor Stinner
2017-06-29 19:13 GMT+02:00 Terry Reedy : > How about compiler warnings (and errors)? That would be nice to have, but I don't have the bandwidth to handle this goal. > When I compile on Windows, there > are a boatload of orange-yellow warnings. Some are about using a deprecated > featured; some

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Steve Dower
On 29Jun2017 1157, Terry Reedy wrote: On 6/29/2017 1:54 PM, Steve Dower wrote: Some warnings are also complicated because of the nature of CPython. For example, the socket module exposes deprecated CRT functions (on Windows) directly because the API of the socket module promises to provide the

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/29/2017 1:54 PM, Steve Dower wrote: On 29Jun2017 1013, Terry Reedy wrote: Great work. Agreed. Thanks, Victor! How about compiler warnings (and errors)? When I compile on Windows, there are a boatload of orange-yellow warnings. Some are about using a deprecated featured; some about do

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Steve Dower
On 29Jun2017 1013, Terry Reedy wrote: Great work. Agreed. Thanks, Victor! How about compiler warnings (and errors)? When I compile on Windows, there are a boatload of orange-yellow warnings. Some are about using a deprecated featured; some about dodgy casts; some (I presume) about other t

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Terry Reedy
On 6/29/2017 11:09 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, Our buildbots are now even more stable than in my previous buildbot report. Many random failures have been fixed, even if there are still many rare random failures (most of them are related to multiprocessing). Search for issues created by "hayp

[Python-Dev] Buildbot report (almost July)

2017-06-29 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Our buildbots are now even more stable than in my previous buildbot report. Many random failures have been fixed, even if there are still many rare random failures (most of them are related to multiprocessing). Search for issues created by "haypo" (me!) with the Component "Tests" to see all

[Python-Dev] Buildbot report, june 2017

2017-06-08 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, With the help of Zachary Ware, we succeed to set up a mailing list getting email notifications when a buildbot fails whereas it previously succeeded (green/success or orange/warnings): https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/buildbot-status.python.org/ Please subscribe if you want to stay

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > However, as I was doing so (and I just discarded a draft message where > I'd been typing up notes), my entire system went kerblooie, and I've > spent the last day rebuilding stuff from scratch. When I get around to > it, I'll rebuild the bui

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Martin Panter wrote: > Other things that come to mind are to see if there is anything odd > about the buildbot’s Linux kernel and glibc versions. Maybe run the > Python script under “strace” to see if anything strange is going on. > I did that, and a few other thi

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-28 Thread Martin Panter
> After digging through test_socket.py for over an hour (the MRO for > RecvmsgUDP6Test is enormous!!), I've boiled the issue down to this: > > import socket > MSG = b'asdf qwer zxcv' > serv = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET6, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) > serv.bind(("::1", 0)) > cli = socket.socket(socket.AF_I

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-27 Thread Chris Angelico
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > 2016-01-23 7:03 GMT+01:00 Chris Angelico : >> Running just that test file: >> >> $ ./python Lib/test/test_socket.py >> ... chomp lots of lines ... >> testRecvmsgPeek (__main__.RecvmsgUDP6Test) ... >> >> seems to indicate that the stall is du

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-27 Thread Victor Stinner
2016-01-23 7:03 GMT+01:00 Chris Angelico : > I just had a major crash on the system that hosts the > angelico-debian-amd64 buildbot, and as usual, checked it carefully > after bringing everything up. It seems now to be timing out after an > hour of operation: > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/buil

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-23 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > 3600 seconds is the maximum duration of a single test file. We may reduce it > since a single test file should not take longer than 30 min. Maybe we can do > better and put the timeout on a single test function. I'd be inclined to put some

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-23 Thread Victor Stinner
3600 seconds is the maximum duration of a single test file. We may reduce it since a single test file should not take longer than 30 min. Maybe we can do better and put the timeout on a single test function. Victor ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> By the way, this looks odd: >> >> make buildbottest TESTOPTS= TESTPYTHONOPTS= TESTTIMEOUT=3600 >> in dir /root/buildarea/3.x.angelico-debian-amd64/build (timeout 3900 secs) >> >> The

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-22 Thread Zachary Ware
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > By the way, this looks odd: > > make buildbottest TESTOPTS= TESTPYTHONOPTS= TESTTIMEOUT=3600 > in dir /root/buildarea/3.x.angelico-debian-amd64/build (timeout 3900 secs) > > The parameter says 3600 (which corresponds to the error message a

[Python-Dev] Buildbot timing out - test suite failure - test_socket issue with UDP6?

2016-01-22 Thread Chris Angelico
I just had a major crash on the system that hosts the angelico-debian-amd64 buildbot, and as usual, checked it carefully after bringing everything up. It seems now to be timing out after an hour of operation: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.x/builds/3132/steps/tes

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread Steve Dower
python-dev@python.org> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it? Le 28 mars 2015 21:15, "David Bolen" mailto:db3l@gmail.com>> a écrit : > I'm assuming you aren't suggesting turning off the XP buildbot > entirely,

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 28 mars 2015 21:15, "David Bolen" a écrit : > I'm assuming you aren't suggesting turning off the XP buildbot > entirely, correct? I'm talking about the 3.x slave, so only python 3.5. Would it be possible to specify in What's New In Python 3.5 which Windows versions are no more supported? Vi

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread David Bolen
Victor Stinner writes: > Would it be possible to fix this buildbot, or to turn it off? (...) > By the way, do we seriously want to support Windows XP? I mean, *who* > will maintain it (no me sorry!). I saw recent changes to explicitly > *drop* support for Windows older than Visa (stop using GetT

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot PPC64 AIX 3.x failures

2015-03-28 Thread David Edelsohn
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > There are many failures on the AIX buildbot. Can someone try to fix > them? Or would it be possible to turn off the buildbot to quickly see > regressions? > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/PPC64%20AIX%203.x/builds/3426/step

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread Victor Stinner
Le samedi 28 mars 2015, Tim Golden a écrit : > > For myself I'm quite willing for someone to ping me with: "there's a > Windows buildbot gone red; can you have a look?" But I have precious little > time, and if the failure requires me to garner an understanding of a > deep-level code change, a ver

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread Tim Golden
On 28/03/2015 09:51, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, The buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore since 3 months or more (maybe when Steve upgraded the Visual Studio project to VS 2015? I don't know). Would it be possible to fix this buildbot, or to turn it off? By the way, do we seriously want

[Python-Dev] Buildbot PPC64 AIX 3.x failures

2015-03-28 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, There are many failures on the AIX buildbot. Can someone try to fix them? Or would it be possible to turn off the buildbot to quickly see regressions? http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/PPC64%20AIX%203.x/builds/3426/steps/test/logs/stdio The buildbot has not enough memory, and some test

[Python-Dev] Buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore: drop it?

2015-03-28 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, The buildbot x86 XP-4 3.x doesn't compile anymore since 3 months or more (maybe when Steve upgraded the Visual Studio project to VS 2015? I don't know). Would it be possible to fix this buildbot, or to turn it off? By the way, do we seriously want to support Windows XP? I mean, *who* will ma

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"

2014-01-01 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:17 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > So it should be able to handle a failover from one link to > the other, but it's certainly better to bind it to the more > reliable transport. I believe you can somehow configure the > frequency of ping messages so that you network doesn't

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"

2014-01-01 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 31.12.13 01:24, schrieb Chris Angelico: > Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? In short: yes. A little bit longer: It uses the Twisted PerspectiveBroker protocol. That has nearly-transparent reconnects (but as your case shows, not fully transparent), and does regular ping

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Zach Ware wrote: >>Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2's >>build-deps. They're now installed, so the next build should have >>everything for that. Does anyone happen to know what (if anything) 3.3 >>needs that 3.2 doesn't? > > You'll n

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Zach Ware
Chris Angelico wrote: >On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Christian Heimes > wrote: >> The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: >> >> # apt-get build-dep python3.3 >> >> to install all required dependencies. > >Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2'

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:24:26 +1100 > Chris Angelico wrote: >> Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: >> >> http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 > > I'm quite sure

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"

2013-12-30 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:24:26 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote: > Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 I'm quite sure it does. It's necessary to get a real-time view of the test log.

[Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 """ Results: Retry exception slave lost """ I have two internet connections; one is faster, but tends to drop socket connections after a few

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: > The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: > > # apt-get build-dep python3.3 > > to install all required dependencies. Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2's build-deps. They're now installe

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:00:02 -0600, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Zachary Ware > wrote: > > and we should just fix the tests that expect zlib unconditionally. > > Both of which turned out to be trivial; the import of zlib was already > guarded in both places, but one sk

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > and we should just fix the tests that expect zlib unconditionally. Both of which turned out to be trivial; the import of zlib was already guarded in both places, but one skip was checking the wrong name and the other just didn't try to skip,

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Zachary Ware
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Christian Heimes wrote: > Am 30.12.2013 15:02, schrieb Chris Angelico: >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as ro

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Christian Heimes
Am 30.12.2013 15:02, schrieb Chris Angelico: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root >>> would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root >> would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian >> Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot f

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-30 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root > would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian > Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version > 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have i

[Python-Dev] [buildbot] Increase number of stored builds

2013-12-11 Thread Stefan Krah
Hello, is it possible to increase the number of stored builds? Sometimes I want to see a build that might be a week or even 6 months old. Examples: 1) Recently I was wondering if the HPUX CFLAGS changed at some point. 2) The HPUX build has the following error: "*** WARNING: renamin

[Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root

2013-12-07 Thread Chris Angelico
In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have it join the farm. How do I go about doing this? I've followed th

[Python-Dev] Buildbot categories

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Snow
Is there a listing of buildbot categories (3.x.stable, custom-stable, etc.)? The best I could find was http://python.org/dev/buildbot/. I couldn't find it at http://buildbot.python.org/ or in the devguide, both places where I expected to find such a list. Thanks! -eric _

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failure puzzle

2013-08-10 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:25:04 -0400 Terry Reedy wrote: > At least the following 3.4 buildbots have failed today with an error I > do not understand: AMD64 FreeBSD, PPC64, x86Ubuntu, x86 WinServer 2003. http://bugs.python.org/issue18706 ___ Python-Dev

[Python-Dev] Buildbot failure puzzle

2013-08-10 Thread Terry Reedy
At least the following 3.4 buildbots have failed today with an error I do not understand: AMD64 FreeBSD, PPC64, x86Ubuntu, x86 WinServer 2003. Except for the Windows BB, it was the only failure and hence the only reason to not be green. ERROR: test_xmlcharnamereplace (test.test_codeccallbacks.C

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-30 Thread Trent Nelson
Just as an FYI, we set up a new "optimized" Snakebite slave yesterday on the Mac OS X Mountain Lion box. I also set up remote access to that box in the process -- you can connect to it via the ~/.snakebite/sb 'x8' alias. (That box happens to be the fastest (and most contempora

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-26 Thread Trent Nelson
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:13:42PM -0700, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2012/9/26 Maciej Fijalkowski : > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Benjamin Peterson > > wrote: > >> In light of issue #16046, I think it would be helpful to have a > >> buildbot running the testsuite with -O enabled. > > > > H

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-26 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2012/9/26 Maciej Fijalkowski : > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Benjamin Peterson > wrote: >> In light of issue #16046, I think it would be helpful to have a >> buildbot running the testsuite with -O enabled. > > How about deprecating -O completely instead? It does not seem to give > any speedu

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-26 Thread R. David Murray
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:00:53 -0400, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > In light of issue #16046, I think it would be helpful to have a > buildbot running the testsuite with -O enabled. I've got some (slow) hardware I could dedicate to this, though it may take me a few weeks to find time to set it up. -

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-26 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > In light of issue #16046, I think it would be helpful to have a > buildbot running the testsuite with -O enabled. How about deprecating -O completely instead? It does not seem to give any speedups and definitely gives headaches.

[Python-Dev] buildbot with -O

2012-09-26 Thread Benjamin Peterson
In light of issue #16046, I think it would be helpful to have a buildbot running the testsuite with -O enabled. -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http:

[Python-Dev] Buildbot master moved

2012-06-28 Thread Martin v. Löwis
I have now moved the buildbot master to OSU/OSL, and upgraded the buildbot version in the process. If there are any issues, let me know or Antoine. Slaves should (and apparently do) reconnect if they were changed to use "buildbot.python.org" as the master. Some probably weren't; we'll figure this

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-11-03 Thread Stefan Behnel
Brian Curtin, 03.11.2011 15:59: On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 14:30, Andrea Crotti wrote: On 10/21/2011 10:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello, There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3 branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the buildbots, so that the

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-11-03 Thread Brian Curtin
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 14:30, Andrea Crotti wrote: > On 10/21/2011 10:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3 >> branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the >> buildbots, so that these failures get s

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-10-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote: > If one is not clearly defined, maybe notifying the last N developers that > committed > between the last successful builds and the failing build, would it be > possible and make sense? Yeah, as Antoine noted, that's where we want to get to e

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-10-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:30:34 +0100 Andrea Crotti wrote: > > In my previous workplace if someone broke a build committing something > wrong he/she > had to bring cake for everyone next meeting. > > The cake is not really feasible I guess, but isn't it possible to notify > the developer that >

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-10-22 Thread Andrea Crotti
On 10/21/2011 10:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello, There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3 branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the buildbots, so that these failures get solved reasonably fast. Regards Antoine. In my previous workplace i

[Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-10-21 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3 branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the buildbots, so that these failures get solved reasonably fast. Regards Antoine. ___ Python-Dev mailing list P

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-08-21 Thread Éric Araujo
Le 20/08/2011 22:52, Paul Moore a écrit : > My buildbot seems to have been failing for a while (I've been away on > holiday) - http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/buildslaves/moore-windows > > The failures seem to generally be in distutils and/or packaging. I see > quite a lot of reds in the waterf

[Python-Dev] Buildbot failures

2011-08-20 Thread Paul Moore
My buildbot seems to have been failing for a while (I've been away on holiday) - http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/buildslaves/moore-windows The failures seem to generally be in distutils and/or packaging. I see quite a lot of reds in the waterfall display at the moment, and I can't see any parti

[Python-Dev] Buildbot status web pages

2011-06-16 Thread David Bolen
I've been receiving 503 errors from the buildbot web status pages beneath www.python.org/dev/buildbot for a day or two now - is there perhaps something that needs a bit of a kick-start? Thanks. -- David ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot status

2011-04-06 Thread Brian Curtin
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 09:05, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > For the record, we have 9 stable buildbots, one of which is currently > offline: 3 Windows, 2 OS X, 3 Linux and 1 Solaris. > Paul Moore's XP buildbot is back in the stable stable. > (http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/waterfal

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot status

2011-04-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 23:55 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : >> Since it appears the intermittent failures affecting these platforms >> have been dealt with, is it time to switch python-committers email >> notifications back on for buildb

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot status

2011-04-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 23:55 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > For the record, we have 9 stable buildbots, one of which is currently > > offline: 3 Windows, 2 OS X, 3 Linux and 1 Solaris. > > Paul Moore's XP buildbot

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot status

2011-04-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > For the record, we have 9 stable buildbots, one of which is currently > offline: 3 Windows, 2 OS X, 3 Linux and 1 Solaris. > Paul Moore's XP buildbot is back in the stable stable. > (http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/waterf

[Python-Dev] Buildbot status

2011-04-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, For the record, we have 9 stable buildbots, one of which is currently offline: 3 Windows, 2 OS X, 3 Linux and 1 Solaris. Paul Moore's XP buildbot is back in the stable stable. (http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable) We also have a new 64-bit FreeBSD 8.2 buil

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:44 AM, David Bolen wrote: > Nick Coghlan writes: > >> I don't want to give up completely on the idea just yet, but I'll >> experiment in the sandbox before I turn it back on. > > If you get to that point again, I'd also be willing to pick a time to > manually check out t

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread David Bolen
Nick Coghlan writes: > I don't want to give up completely on the idea just yet, but I'll > experiment in the sandbox before I turn it back on. If you get to that point again, I'd also be willing to pick a time to manually check out the right branch or whatever and try it manually on one of two o

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> I suspect, however, that as soon as something else commits to the 3.x >> branch and causes a new test, that test_crashers (presumably from >> changeset 9c6dcb5d8f01) will likely just take the slaves down again. > > The test is already disab

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:41:51 -0400 David Bolen wrote: > > Thanks. Is that a single button somewhere or do I need to cancel the > pending builds individually when there are several waiting? There seems to be a single button. > In any event it looks like the retries of the failing 3.x build > st

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread David Bolen
Antoine Pitrou writes: > I've enabled the button to cancel pending builds in the Web UI. You > should be able to bring back the Ubuntu slave online. You can do the > same (cancel pending builds) for other slaves if needed. Thanks. Is that a single button somewhere or do I need to cancel the pen

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:45:10 -0400 David Bolen wrote: > > The problem is that the failing build is automatically retried when I > try to reconnect the buildbot, so it just get rights into trouble > again. The comment in that build's changeset looks like it might be > getting rolled back? > > As

[Python-Dev] buildbot VM exhausted in test_crashers

2011-03-19 Thread David Bolen
I've run out of virtual memory on my Ubuntu buildbot today (and I think the FreeBSD buildbots a few days ago). Those have physically OOMd/restarted the VM. The Windows buildbots have been giving me VM warnings, but appear to have gotten through it. I believe it's the test_crashers test, which wh

[Python-Dev] buildbot error when pushing to 2.5 branch?

2011-03-17 Thread Senthil Kumaran
When pushed a change to 2.5 branch, I got an error, which I think has to do with buildbot not available for 2.5 codeline. It asked me to notify the tracker and here it is. remote: state = method(*args, **kw) remote: File "/data/buildbot/master/master.cfg", line 87, in perspective_addChange r

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-13 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 13.11.2010 14:00, schrieb Mark Dickinson: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> As you may have noticed: I updated the buildbot master to release 0.8.2. >> If you notice any problems, please post them here. > > One effect of this change seems to be that bbreport[1] no

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-13 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > As you may have noticed: I updated the buildbot master to release 0.8.2. > If you notice any problems, please post them here. One effect of this change seems to be that bbreport[1] no longer works, since it appears that buildbot 0.8.2 ha

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-12 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:53:00 +0100 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > Thanks Martin, for all you do to keep our infrastructure humming along > > smoothly, including the recent Roundup migration. > > I just write the announcements :-) In this case. thanks should also > extend to Izak Burger of Upfront H

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-12 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Thanks Martin, for all you do to keep our infrastructure humming along > smoothly, including the recent Roundup migration. I just write the announcements :-) In this case. thanks should also extend to Izak Burger of Upfront Hosting who did most of the setup (I just did the DNS changes), and to b

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-12 Thread Paul Moore
On 12 November 2010 16:15, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 12, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >>As you may have noticed: I updated the buildbot master to release 0.8.2. >>If you notice any problems, please post them here. > > Pretty!  My buildbot seems fine. Yes, I like the new look. >

Re: [Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 12, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >As you may have noticed: I updated the buildbot master to release 0.8.2. >If you notice any problems, please post them here. Pretty! My buildbot seems fine. >Slave operators can upgrade their installations at their own pace; >buildbot is hig

[Python-Dev] buildbot master update

2010-11-12 Thread Martin v. Löwis
As you may have noticed: I updated the buildbot master to release 0.8.2. If you notice any problems, please post them here. Slave operators can upgrade their installations at their own pace; buildbot is highly backwards compatible. As a recommendation, I suggest that slaves run at least at the ver

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-11-08 Thread exarkun
On 05:50 pm, solip...@pitrou.net wrote: Le lundi 08 novembre 2010 � 18:46 +0100, S�bastien Sabl� a �crit : xlc: 1501-216 (W) command option - -qmaxmem=18000 is not recognized - passed to ld Is -qmaxmem really necessary to build Python? If so, you could try passing it in CFLAGS. However running

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-11-08 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Hi Antoine, I tried to provide command lines arguments to configure instead of environment variables with: configureFlags = ["--with-pydebug", "--without-computed-gotos", "CC=xlc", 'OPT="-O2 -qmaxmem=18000"'] But that would fail: on the slave, configure would run like that: ./configure --wi

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-11-08 Thread C. Titus Brown
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:50:32PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > However running 2 different slaves per host in order to distinguish xlc > > and gcc would be OK; though I would appreciate if they could run > > sequentially rather than in parallel as that would limit the host load. > > If ther

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-11-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le lundi 08 novembre 2010 à 18:46 +0100, Sébastien Sablé a écrit : > xlc: 1501-216 (W) command option - -qmaxmem=18000 is not recognized - > passed to ld Is -qmaxmem really necessary to build Python? If so, you could try passing it in CFLAGS. > However running 2 different slaves per host in orde

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-28 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:38:47 +0200 Sébastien Sablé wrote: > > Could you please take a look at those modifications in master.cfg, > provide me some password for the bot slaves and apply the corrections in > those issues? About the master.cfg modifications: there should be no need for separate e

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-28 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I got no reply concerning those modifications to the buildbot script so > that I could run 2 slaves on AIX. I'm really really reluctant here. The proposed/requested changes are fairly intrusive, even though AIX is just a minority platform. So I need to find some time to rewrite them, which I hav

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-28 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Hi Martin, I got no reply concerning those modifications to the buildbot script so that I could run 2 slaves on AIX. I am able to spend some time at the moment on Python for AIX because we are migrating the product in my company from AIX 5.3 to AIX 6.1. However once this is done, by the end o

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-18 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Hi Sridhar, Le 15/10/2010 18:50, Sridhar Ratnakumar a écrit : We definitely like to share our core Python patches for AIX 5.1/5.2 and other platforms. Great to hear that ActiveState shares their improvements for Python on AIX! Thanks for the patch in git, I will check it and try to open some

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-17 Thread R. David Murray
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:38:47 +0200, =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBTYWJsw6k=?= wrote: > I finally got the authorization to run some buildbot slaves on our AIX > servers. > > I made some tests with a buildbot script as close as possible to what > you already use. Here is a patch that show the kind of

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-15 Thread Sridhar Ratnakumar
On 2010-09-20, at 7:41 AM, Sébastien Sablé wrote: > Le 17/09/2010 15:05, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : >> Following on Martin's comments, you might also want to share things >> with the ActiveState guys who, AFAIK, maintain an AIX version of Python >> (but you have been the most active AIX user on the

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-10-15 Thread Sébastien Sablé
Hi Martin, I finally got the authorization to run some buildbot slaves on our AIX servers. I made some tests with a buildbot script as close as possible to what you already use. Here is a patch that show the kind of modifications I had to do in order to get the buildbot slave to correctly ru

Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot for AIX

2010-09-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Also could you provide me the master.cfg file (with obfuscated > passwords) that is used by the Python buildbot master or tell me if it > is in subversion somewhere? Attached! Regards, Martin # -*- python -*- # This is a sample buildmaster config file. It must be installed as # 'master.cfg' in

  1   2   3   4   >