>> Unfortunately this advice should have been taken several years
>> ago. The fact is that there are almost certainly Python users who
>> rely on the presence of the bsddb module for production work, and
>> simply removing it without deprecation is bound to upset those users.
G
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oleg Broytmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:34:37AM -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>>> You could probably have built the bsddb185 module and loaded your data
>>> from that and rewritten it using the new bsddb module.
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:34:37AM -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>> You could probably have built the bsddb185 module and loaded your data
>> from that and rewritten it using the new bsddb module.
>
>I built bsddb185, loaded old data, exported it to... I don't remember
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:34:37AM -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> You could probably have built the bsddb185 module and loaded your data
> from that and rewritten it using the new bsddb module.
I built bsddb185, loaded old data, exported it to... I don't remember
now, but I clearly remember I
