Re: [Python-Dev] __sizeof__ tests

2012-07-28 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
On 28.07.12 12:58, Chris Jerdonek wrote: This is nearly the same as the question I asked below about feature freeze (or that I was trying to ask), to which I thought I received an answer different from the one stated above: Thank you, Chris. ___ Pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] __sizeof__ tests

2012-07-28 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > I have a set of patches about the correct __sizeof__ implementations (one > has already been committed (issue #15456), 13 left, 2 of them published > (#15469 for deque and #15475 for itertools)). The most tedious is to write > tests for th

[Python-Dev] __sizeof__ tests

2012-07-28 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Sat Jul 28 10:54:24 CEST 2012, Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com wrote: > For not to duplicate the supporting code, I suggest > add (move from test_sys test) three utility functions to test.support > module (issue #15467). Also from the use of the common code will benefit > issues #15402

[Python-Dev] __sizeof__ tests

2012-07-28 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
I have a set of patches about the correct __sizeof__ implementations (one has already been committed (issue #15456), 13 left, 2 of them published (#15469 for deque and #15475 for itertools)). The most tedious is to write tests for them, especially paranoid tests, on which Martin v. Löwis insist