OK, I'll withdraw from this discussion again. Thanks all!
On 8/11/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> > Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> >> Here is my C-API proposal
> >>
> >> 1) PyIndex_Check(obj)
> >>
> >>Similar to PyIter_Check(obj) as it just checks for whe
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
>> Here is my C-API proposal
>>
>> 1) PyIndex_Check(obj)
>>
>>Similar to PyIter_Check(obj) as it just checks for whether or not the
>> object can call nb_index. Actually implemented as a macro.
>>
>> 2) PyObject* PyNumber_Index(obj)
>>
>>
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Here is my C-API proposal
>
> 1) PyIndex_Check(obj)
>
>Similar to PyIter_Check(obj) as it just checks for whether or not the
> object can call nb_index. Actually implemented as a macro.
>
> 2) PyObject* PyNumber_Index(obj)
>
>Simple interface around nb_inde
Here is my C-API proposal
1) PyIndex_Check(obj)
Similar to PyIter_Check(obj) as it just checks for whether or not the
object can call nb_index. Actually implemented as a macro.
2) PyObject* PyNumber_Index(obj)
Simple interface around nb_index that calls it if possible and returns
Ty
(adding back python-dev in the CC: list)
Right. I guess I didn't recompile after patching. Silly me (as Orlijn
would say :-).
Neal+Anthony, do you need me to review Nick's patch? If I don't have
to I'd rather pay more attention to py3k, which I've sadly neglected
in the past month (apart from giv
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> What do you think (10**10).__index__() should return (when called from
> Python)?
>
I'm with Guido on this point. I think (10**10).__index__() should
return the full long integer when called from within Python.
-Travis
__
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Thanks for your understanding.
>
> Anyway, Nick's patch differs in at least one significant way from my
> proposal -- (10**10).__index__() returns sys.maxint in his patch,
> while I want it to return 100L. So this is still an open
> issue.
>
I've reviewed Nick's
Thanks for your understanding.
Anyway, Nick's patch differs in at least one significant way from my
proposal -- (10**10).__index__() returns sys.maxint in his patch,
while I want it to return 100L. So this is still an open
issue.
--Guido
On 8/10/06, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 8/10/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
It seems like Nick's recent patches solved the problems that were
identified.
>>> Nick, can you summarize how your patches differ from my proposal?
>> nb_index and __index__ are essent
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 8/10/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> >> It seems like Nick's recent patches solved the problems that were
>> >> identified.
>> >
>> > Nick, can you summarize how your patches differ from my proposal?
>>
>> nb_index and __index__
On 8/10/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >> It seems like Nick's recent patches solved the problems that were
> >> identified.
> >
> > Nick, can you summarize how your patches differ from my proposal?
>
> nb_index and __index__ are essentially exactly as you p
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> It seems like Nick's recent patches solved the problems that were
>> identified.
>
> Nick, can you summarize how your patches differ from my proposal?
nb_index and __index__ are essentially exactly as you propose. To make an
object implemented in C usable as an index y
On 8/9/06, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Here's another issue where Neal thought it would be useful if I
> > weighed in. I'm not quite sure of the current status, but perhaps the
> > following would work?
> >
> > - Called from Python, (10**10).__index__
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Here's another issue where Neal thought it would be useful if I
> weighed in. I'm not quite sure of the current status, but perhaps the
> following would work?
>
> - Called from Python, (10**10).__index__() should return 100L,
> not raise an exception or return sy
Here's another issue where Neal thought it would be useful if I
weighed in. I'm not quite sure of the current status, but perhaps the
following would work?
- Called from Python, (10**10).__index__() should return 100L,
not raise an exception or return sys.maxint.
- The nb_index slot is ch
15 matches
Mail list logo
