I wrote:
> I've sent an updated version of PEP 363 to the editors, which
> includes the following summary of the discussion. I hope I've
> captured the important points, but please let me know if there's
> something important I've left out or misrepresented.
There were a couple of points made off
On 2/15/07, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 09:08, Ben North wrote:
> > The wrapper class idea was left
> > open as a possibility for a future PEP.
>
> A good first step would be to contribute something like this to the
> Python Cookbook, if it isn't already t
On Friday 16 February 2007 09:08, Ben North wrote:
> Instead of new syntax, a new "wrapper class" was proposed,
> with the following specification / conceptual implementation
> suggested by Martin Loewis:
>
> ...snip...
>
> This was considered a cleaner and more elegant solution to
> the o
I've sent an updated version of PEP 363 to the editors, which
includes the following summary of the discussion. I hope I've
captured the important points, but please let me know if there's
something important I've left out or misrepresented.
- - - - 8< - - - -
Mailing Lists Discussion
Initi
