> Martin, you've changed externals/bsddb-4.4.20 with regards to x64
> builds recently -- have you been able to get things working in your
> x64 environments?
I changed the project files so that it will use the x64 compilers
even if no environment variables were set - the original bsddb files
expec
> The other query I had was whether or not I should try a later version
> of BerkeleyDB -- are we committed to 4.4.20 (or 4.4.x?) for 2.6/3.0
> or is it worth investigating newer versions? Martin/Jesus, any
> thoughts on this?
As Greg says: 4.5.x should work fine.
Importing a new version into th
> I reviewed all the compiler options used by db_static.vcproj -- the
> only thing I needed to bring over was -DDIAGNOSTIC for debug builds.
> Everything else either had no impact and could be safely dropped, or
> conflicted with compiler options used by the rest of the python build
> (function lev
> > Removing the dependency on db_static.vcproj and merging the relevant
> > source code files into _bsddb.vcproj did the trick -- all x64
> > bsddb-related tests now pass. The only issue with this approach is
> > that it locks _bsddb.vcproj into 4.4.20. However, considering that
> > this approac
> Removing the dependency on db_static.vcproj and merging the relevant
> source code files into _bsddb.vcproj did the trick -- all x64
> bsddb-related tests now pass. The only issue with this approach is
> that it locks _bsddb.vcproj into 4.4.20. However, considering that
> this approach (i.e. br
Ah, and to think I just fixed 4.4.20 ;-)
Removing the dependency on db_static.vcproj and merging the relevant source
code files into _bsddb.vcproj did the trick -- all x64 bsddb-related tests now
pass. The only issue with this approach is that it locks _bsddb.vcproj into
4.4.20. However, con
On 3/13/08, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Greg,
>
> I'm at PyCon indeed, staying through the sprints 'til next Thursday. I'll
> drop you a note offline re catching up.
>
> The other query I had was whether or not I should try a later version of
> BerkeleyDB -- are we committed to
Hey Greg,
I'm at PyCon indeed, staying through the sprints 'til next Thursday. I'll drop
you a note offline re catching up.
The other query I had was whether or not I should try a later version of
BerkeleyDB -- are we committed to 4.4.20 (or 4.4.x?) for 2.6/3.0 or is it worth
investigating ne
I haven't built the bsddb stuff on windows myself in a few years and have
never had access to a windows x64 system so I'm no silver bullet. Making
the BerkeleyDB compile and link options match with those of python is the
first place I'd start. Also you should be able to make a debug build of
Berk
I've been trying to give the Windows x64 builds a bit of TLC the past few
evenings. I managed to get a successful build with all external modules last
night (Tcl/Tk required about a half a dozen code/configuration changes each in
order to build in a Windows x64 environment with Visual Studio 9,
10 matches
Mail list logo
