Am 23.01.2011 02:48, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>>> The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the
>>> What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff
On 1/22/2011 2:20 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:04:00 -0500
Terry Reedy wrote:
The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the
What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises
about 650KB in the repository and whatever that translates
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the
>> What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises about
>> 650KB in the repository and wha
On Jan 22, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the What's
> new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises about 650KB in
> the repository and whatever that translates into in the distribution. I
> cannot imag
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:04:00 -0500
Terry Reedy wrote:
> The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the
> What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises
> about 650KB in the repository and whatever that translates into in the
> distribution. I cannot
The 3.x docs mostly started fresh with 3.0. The major exception is the
What's new section, which goes back to 2.0. The 2.x stuff comprises
about 650KB in the repository and whatever that translates into in the
distribution. I cannot imagine that anyone who only has 3.x and no 2.x
version would
