On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 at 10:11 Laxmikant Chitare
wrote:
> Hi Team Python,
>
> It is really nice, motivating and encouraging to see people contribute to
> community in spite of the work load. "Thank you" is just not enough to
> appreciate your efforts. I have been programming in Python for quite some
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Laxmikant Chitare
wrote:
>
> It is really nice, motivating and encouraging to see people contribute to
> community in spite of the work load. "Thank you" is just not enough to
> appreciate your efforts. I have been programming in Python for quite some
> time and I a
Hi Team Python,
It is really nice, motivating and encouraging to see people contribute to
community in spite of the work load. "Thank you" is just not enough to
appreciate your efforts. I have been programming in Python for quite some
time and I am loving it more as days pass by. I have been think
On 2015-09-05 2:23 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Awesome! We need more people with those skills!
--Guido (on mobile)
Great, we'll start today!
Thanks,
Yury
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
Awesome! We need more people with those skills!
--Guido (on mobile)
On Sep 5, 2015 11:07 AM, "Yury Selivanov" wrote:
> On 2015-09-05 1:27 PM, David Mertz wrote:
>
>> I have to apologize profusely here. Just after I offered to do this (and
>> work even said it was OK in principle to do it on wor
On 2015-09-05 1:27 PM, David Mertz wrote:
I have to apologize profusely here. Just after I offered to do this
(and work even said it was OK in principle to do it on work time), my
work load went through the roof. And now it's really already later
than most of it should have been done. I'd st
On September 5, 2015 12:27:26 PM CDT, David Mertz wrote:
>I have to apologize profusely here. Just after I offered to do this
>(and
>work even said it was OK in principle to do it on work time), my work
>load
>went through the roof. And now it's really already later than most of
>it
>should ha
I have to apologize profusely here. Just after I offered to do this (and
work even said it was OK in principle to do it on work time), my work load
went through the roof. And now it's really already later than most of it
should have been done. I'd still very much like to work on this, but I
wond
On 2015-07-06 11:38 AM, David Mertz wrote:
Hi Folks,
I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on
python-dev are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis,
my boss at Continuum, and he's happy to allow me to do that work
within my salaried hours... so havi
On Jul 06, 2015, at 09:32 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>FWIW, it took me 100+ hours. Doing this right is a non-trivial undertaking
>(in modern times, there are an astonishing number of changes per release).
>That said, it is rewarding work that makes a difference.
Indeed. During distro Python
On 7 July 2015 at 01:38, David Mertz wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on
> python-dev are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis, my boss
> at Continuum, and he's happy to allow me to do that work within my salaried
> hours... s
FWIW, it took me 100+ hours. Doing this right is a non-trivial undertaking
(in modern times, there are an astonishing number of changes per release).
That said, it is rewarding work that makes a difference.
Raymond
[David Murray]
I can tell you that 3.4 took me approximately 67 hours accordin
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:45:01 +0300, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> On 05.07.15 20:52, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will have
> > time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for 3.3
> > and
> > 3.4. I've tried to e
On 07/06/2015 08:38 AM, David Mertz wrote:
I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on python-dev
are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis, my boss at Continuum, and he's
happy to allow me to do that
work within my salaried hours... so having time isn't
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:38 AM David Mertz wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on
> python-dev are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis, my
> boss at Continuum, and he's happy to allow me to do that work within my
> salaried hou
On 05.07.15 20:52, R. David Murray wrote:
Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will have
time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for 3.3 and
3.4. I've tried to encourage people to keep What's New up to date, but
*someone* should make a fina
Hi Folks,
I hereby volunteer to write "What's New for Python 3.5?" if folks on
python-dev are fine with me taking the job (i.e. I ran it by Travis, my
boss at Continuum, and he's happy to allow me to do that work within my
salaried hours... so having time isn't a problem).
If this is OK with the
On 6 July 2015 at 12:42, David Mertz wrote:
> I think I might be able to "volunteer" for the task of writing/editing the
> "What's New in 3.5" docs. I saw David's comment on it today, so obviously
> haven't yet had a chance to run it by my employer (Continuum Analytics), but
> I have a hunch they
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 03:52, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will
> have
> > time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for
> 3.3 and
> > 3.4.
>
> And thank you
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:06:41 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 6 July 2015 at 03:52, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will have
> > time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for 3.3
> > and
> > 3.4.
>
> And thank
On 6 July 2015 at 03:52, R. David Murray wrote:
> Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will have
> time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for 3.3 and
> 3.4.
And thank you again for your work on those!
> I've tried to encourage people to ke
Just so people aren't caught unawares, it is very unlikely that I will have
time to be the final editor on "What's New for 3.5" they way I was for 3.3 and
3.4. I've tried to encourage people to keep What's New up to date, but
*someone* should make a final editing pass. Ideally they'd do at least
22 matches
Mail list logo
