Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-02-01 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On 1/31/08, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jesus Cea wrote: > > My guess is that 2.5 branch is still open to more patches than pure > > security/stability patches, so "backporting" BerkeleyDB 4.6 support > > seems reasonable (to me). If I'm wrong, please educate me :-). > > I think

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-02-01 Thread Jaroslav Pachola
It would be very nice if http://bugs.python.org/issue1692335 fix was included in 2.5.2. The patch exists, have been tested, reviewed by Georg Brandl, who says he needs some other developer to review the patches (there is a separate patch for 2.6). Could please someone look at the issue and help

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-31 Thread Neal Norwitz
On Jan 31, 2008 1:42 AM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > |> As current bsddb module maintainer, I was wondering if 2.5.2 will > |> support BerkeleyDB 4.6 :-?. > | > | Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question - whom a

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-31 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Current bsddb module in 2.5.1 supports up to BerkeleyDB 4.5. There is > support for 4.6 in trunk (future 2.6, I guess) and I'm working in a > private branch at the moment, since I have no commit access to python > repository. That private version is intented to be merged into python > 2.6 by Greg

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-31 Thread Aahz
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008, Jesus Cea wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin v. L?wis wrote: > |> As current bsddb module maintainer, I was wondering if 2.5.2 will > |> support BerkeleyDB 4.6 :-?. > | > | Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question - whom are asking? > | If me

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-31 Thread Christian Heimes
Jesus Cea wrote: > My guess is that 2.5 branch is still open to more patches than pure > security/stability patches, so "backporting" BerkeleyDB 4.6 support > seems reasonable (to me). If I'm wrong, please educate me :-). I think you are wrong, sorry pal! DB 4.6 support is a new feature. New featu

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-31 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin v. Löwis wrote: |> As current bsddb module maintainer, I was wondering if 2.5.2 will |> support BerkeleyDB 4.6 :-?. | | Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question - whom are asking? | If me - Python 2.5.2 will essentially do what the maintenance br

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-30 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> | It is my pleasure to announce that I have been appointed as the release > | manager for the upcoming releases. For 2.5.2, I would like to release > | a candidate on February 14, and the final version on February 21. As > | Guido already mentioned, this will be a bug fix release only; no new > |

Re: [Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-30 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin v. Löwis wrote: | It is my pleasure to announce that I have been appointed as the release | manager for the upcoming releases. For 2.5.2, I would like to release | a candidate on February 14, and the final version on February 21. As | Guido alre

[Python-Dev] Upcoming 2.5.2 release

2008-01-27 Thread Martin v. Löwis
It is my pleasure to announce that I have been appointed as the release manager for the upcoming releases. For 2.5.2, I would like to release a candidate on February 14, and the final version on February 21. As Guido already mentioned, this will be a bug fix release only; no new features allowed.