Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread glyph
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:57:07 -0400, "Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found >that there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed sprint >that affects the PEP 302 protocol in a backwards incompatible way.

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Brett Cannon
On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 12:28 PM 7/20/2006 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:>On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:>>While investigating the need to apply>>http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found>>that there was

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 12:28 PM 7/20/2006 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: >On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>While investigating the need to apply >>http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found >>that there was a modification to pkgutil during the nee

Re: [Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Brett Cannon
On 7/20/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766 I foundthat there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed sprintthat affects the PEP 302 protocol in a backwards incompatible way. Specifically, PEP 302 documents

[Python-Dev] Undocumented PEP 302 protocol change by need-for-speed sprint

2006-07-20 Thread Phillip J. Eby
While investigating the need to apply http://python.org/sf/1525766 I found that there was a modification to pkgutil during the need-for-speed sprint that affects the PEP 302 protocol in a backwards incompatible way. Specifically, PEP 302 documents that path_importer_cache always contains either