[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fine with me. Is it ready to go though? If not, what more needs to be
> done? I was under the assumption that it wasn't ready for prime time and
> solicited inputs on c.l.py in a couple messages yesterday and today.
Primarily, it needs a dedicated operator. Somebody w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul> In the old days, it was possible to post stuff to Python's
> Paul> sourceforge pages without logging in. That was turned off for
> Paul> various reasons that weren't bogus, but that didn't strike me as
> Paul> overwhelmingly compelling. Maybe that
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> If the submitter is anonymous, not only can we not follow up with any
> questions, neither does the submitter get notified of status changes on their
> tracker.
Would not simply requesting an email address along with
the report provide enough information for questioning an
[Nick]
>> Can we put a warning on the anonymous submission page pointing out
>> the problems with using it for non-trivial bug reports?
[Skip]
> I don't think we have any control over the boilerplate SF displays.
There must be some control. There's a "Outlook users please see the
list of frequ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In c.l.py Paul Rubin wrote:
>
> Paul> In the old days, it was possible to post stuff to Python's
> Paul> sourceforge pages without logging in. That was turned off for
> Paul> various reasons that weren't bogus, but that didn't strike me as
> Paul> overw
Guido> Anyway, now that we've moved to our own Subversion, the trackers
Guido> are the lsat part of the Python infrastructure that remains on
Guido> SF. There's a perfectly capable replacement ready to wait on
Guido> python.org. Maybe we should finally switch to roundup so we can
On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're preaching to the choir. I'm made the same argument over and over on
> c.l.py, but there is a vocal minority there that believes the current state
> of affairs is a barrier that prevents submissions.
I definitely don't want anonymou
>> Any thoughts about maybe relaxing the login restriction?
Nick> If the submitter is anonymous, not only can we not follow up with
Nick> any questions, neither does the submitter get notified of status
Nick> changes on their tracker.
You're preaching to the choir. I'm made the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In c.l.py Paul Rubin wrote:
>
> Paul> In the old days, it was possible to post stuff to Python's
> Paul> sourceforge pages without logging in. That was turned off for
> Paul> various reasons that weren't bogus, but that didn't strike me as
> Paul> overwh
In c.l.py Paul Rubin wrote:
Paul> In the old days, it was possible to post stuff to Python's
Paul> sourceforge pages without logging in. That was turned off for
Paul> various reasons that weren't bogus, but that didn't strike me as
Paul> overwhelmingly compelling. Maybe that cou
10 matches
Mail list logo
