On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 22.02.2012 19:46, schrieb Maciej Fijalkowski:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
>>> What is the hash of "ePjNTUhitHkL"?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> P.S. It took me roughly 86h to compute 150 strings colliding for th
Am 22.02.2012 19:46, schrieb Maciej Fijalkowski:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
>> What is the hash of "ePjNTUhitHkL"?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>> P.S. It took me roughly 86h to compute 150 strings colliding for the 64-bit
>> hash function.
>
> You should have used pypy, should hav
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> What is the hash of "ePjNTUhitHkL"?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> P.S. It took me roughly 86h to compute 150 strings colliding for the 64-bit
> hash function.
You should have used pypy, should have been faster.
___
What is the hash of "ePjNTUhitHkL"?
Regards,
Martin
P.S. It took me roughly 86h to compute 150 strings colliding for the
64-bit hash function.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Uns