On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
> command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A patch and test
> case have been proposed.
Other pdb commands are also broken for the same reason (no trace
func
On 30.04.2012 18:09, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb ad
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
> 3.2 and 3.3. I think, it would most visible if you were to use a full
> screen debugger and you will notice that the return call indicator has
> jumped to the next stat
Senthil, if you can shepherd this patch to completion that would be great!
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one
>> of
>> the pdb add-o
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:09:02PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
> the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits into the stdlib?
Irrespective of this - Issue13183 seems to be an easy to verify bug in
3.2 and 3.3. I
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
>>believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
>
> Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adoptin
On Apr 30, 2012, at 08:42 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
>believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
Maybe we should take this opportunity (Python 3.3) to consider adopting one of
the pdb add-ons or borging the best of their bits int
IT would be good if the author of one of the pdb add-ons such as (I
believe) pdb2 could comment on this bug.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
> command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A pa
Issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13183 raises the point that the step
command of pdb is broken. This issue is 6 months old. A patch and test
case have been proposed. The 'Lifecycle of a Patch' at
http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html says
If your patch has not received any notice from review
