On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:17:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:57 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> On 4/27/2010 5:14 PM, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
> >>> You only have resolutions on closed issues,
> >> Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> You only have resolutions on closed issues,
>> Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'languishing'?
>
> Probably for all of them. I don't understand languishing, though
> (neither as an English word, nor as a status).
>> You only have resolutions on closed issues,
>
> Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'languishing'?
Probably for all of them. I don't understand languishing, though
(neither as an English word, nor as a status).
> 'Languishing' is new (its first use was two months ago). Is it a form of
R. David Murray wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:57 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 4/27/2010 5:14 PM, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
>>> You only have resolutions on closed issues,
>> Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'languishing'?
>> If pending were implemented to mean 'auto close in x d
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:11:57 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 5:14 PM, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
> > You only have resolutions on closed issues,
>
> Only for 'closed' or also for 'pending' and 'languishing'?
> If pending were implemented to mean 'auto close in x days', then
> Resolution w
On 4/27/2010 5:14 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
The page doesn't document the Resolution or Status fields.
The resolutions are the same as the ones on SourceForge.
They no longer have to be (see below). In any case, the meanings should
be independently documented here for people not currently
