There are non-stable buildbots that are failing consistently, but this
message is about something else. Now that the biggest stability
issues have been addressed some less-noisy stability issues are visible.
The two that I have noticed most often are test_httpsservers, which
hangs occasionally, a
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> Yes, I think this just started happening. I'm guessing that the main
>> site proxies the buildbot URL requests to the buildbot master process,
>> and when it's down you get the 404s from the main server.
>>
>> I figured someone might be working on the master, though per
> Yes, I think this just started happening. I'm guessing that the main
> site proxies the buildbot URL requests to the buildbot master process,
> and when it's down you get the 404s from the main server.
>
> I figured someone might be working on the master, though perhaps it
> just burped on its o
"R. David Murray" writes:
> The buildbot pages appear to be pretty messed up now. I get many 404s
> (ex: the above url, the all stable builders page), although some seem to
> work (ex: the all builders page), and if I stick an 'all' into the URL
> for my buildbot page I can get to it, though tha
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 at 00:09, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Martin v. L??wis v.loewis.de> writes:
The buildbots still show occasional oddities. For example, right now in
the page "http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/3.x/";, some results have
disappeared (the columns for "AMD64 Ubuntu" builders have be
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>
> > The buildbots still show occasional oddities. For example, right now in
> > the page "http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/3.x/";, some results have
> > disappeared (the columns for "AMD64 Ubuntu" builders have become empty).
>
> Yes, I noticed it too.
>> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
>> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
>> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
>> did contribute several fixes!)).
>
> The buildbots still show occasional oddit
Le Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:53:27 -0500, R. David Murray a écrit :
> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
> did contribute sever
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I'd just like to say thanks again to everyone for making the buildbots
> more green and also improving the general testing infrastructure for
> Python.
I'm *really* liking the new assertions in unittest.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> (2) issue 4970: consistent signal 32 error on the norwitz-x86 Gentoo
>> buildslave in 3.1 and 3.x. This may be due to the box
>> running an old threading library,
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 at 19:44, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
JFTR, I didn't set up the IRC bot (I assume that credit goes to Martin,
even if it's only one line in the buildbot config :). I just tried to
get it to say something :)
Yes, it was always "on". I don't use IRC regularly, so I don't know
whe
> JFTR, I didn't set up the IRC bot (I assume that credit goes to Martin,
> even if it's only one line in the buildbot config :). I just tried to
> get it to say something :)
Yes, it was always "on". I don't use IRC regularly, so I don't know
whether it's useful.
Regards,
Martin
On Nov 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
R. David Murray schrieb:
So, overall I think the buildbot fleet is in good shape, and if
we can nail issue 6748 I think it will be back to being an
important resource for sanity checking our checkins.
Yay! Thanks to all of you!
Indeed! It's
R. David Murray schrieb:
> The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
> contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
> and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
> did contribute several fixes!)).
[...]
> In the 'unstable'
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> (1) issue 3864: FreeBSD testing hangs consistently. According to the
> ticket this is a FreeBSD bug fixed in 6.4, so an OS upgrade
> on the buildslave would probably solve it.
I think the particular issue mentioned in 386
The buildbot waterfall is much greener now. Thanks to all who have
contributed to making it so (and it hasn't just been Mark and Antoine
and I, though we've been the most directly active (and yes, Mark, you
did contribute several fixes!)).
The 'stable builders' fleet is green now except for:
16 matches
Mail list logo
