On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Jim J. Jewett
wrote:
>
>
> At Thu May 21 22:27:50 CEST 2015, Guido wrote:
>
> > I want to encourage users to think about annotations as types,
> > and for most users the distinction between type and class is
> > too subtle,
>
> So what is the distinction that you
At Thu May 21 22:27:50 CEST 2015, Guido wrote:
> I want to encourage users to think about annotations as types,
> and for most users the distinction between type and class is
> too subtle,
So what is the distinction that you are trying to make?
That a type refers to a variable (name), and a cl
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
>
> Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> > PY2, etc. really need to go.
> > Assuming that this code type checks OK:
> >
> > if typing.PY2:
> > type_safe_under_py2_only()
> > else:
> > type_safe_under_py3_only()
> >
> > Is the checker supposed
Mark Shannon wrote:
> PY2, etc. really need to go.
> Assuming that this code type checks OK:
>
> if typing.PY2:
> type_safe_under_py2_only()
> else:
> type_safe_under_py3_only()
>
> Is the checker supposed to pass this:
>
> if sys.hexversion < 0x0300:
> type_safe_under_py2_
Things are looking up. I think we're down to a very small number of issues
where we still disagree -- hopefully you'll allow me some leeway. :-)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
>
>
> On 21/05/15 16:01, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> We're down to the last few it
On 21/05/15 16:01, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Hi Mark,
We're down to the last few items here. I'm CC'ing python-dev so folks
can see how close we are. I'll answer point by point.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Mark Shannon mailto:m...@hotpy.org>> wrote:
Hi,
The PEP itself is looking
Hi Mark,
We're down to the last few items here. I'm CC'ing python-dev so folks can
see how close we are. I'll answer point by point.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PEP itself is looking fairly good.
>
I hope you'll accept it at least provisionally so we can
