Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> sure the urllib tests already fire up a local server). Starting down
> the path of standardisation of that test functionality would be good.
I've made a start with test_logging.py by implementing some potential server
classes for use in tests: in the latest test
Hi,
Le 29/04/2011 18:09, Vinay Sajip a écrit :
[Georg]
BTW, didn't we agree not to put "pragma" comments into the stdlib
code?
I'd be grateful for a link to the prior discussion - it must have
passed me by
originally, and I searched python-dev on gmane but couldn't find any
threads
about thi
Terry Reedy udel.edu> writes:
> > http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
>
> which, however, currently has nothing for *.py.
> Perhaps a glitch/bug, as there used to be such.
> Anyone who knows the page owner might ask about this.
>
Thanks for the pointer, nevertheless, Terry.
Regards,
Vinay Sajip
On 4/29/2011 3:11 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/29/2011 12:09 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
BTW, is there a public place somewhere showing stdlib coverage
statistics? I
looked on the buildbot pages as the likeliest home for them, but
perhaps I
missed them.
http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
On 4/29/2011 12:09 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
BTW, is there a public place somewhere showing stdlib coverage statistics? I
looked on the buildbot pages as the likeliest home for them, but perhaps I
missed them.
http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html
has a link to
http://coverage.livinglogic
[Georg]
> > BTW, didn't we agree not to put "pragma" comments into the stdlib code?
I'd be grateful for a link to the prior discussion - it must have passed me by
originally, and I searched python-dev on gmane but couldn't find any threads
about this.
[Nick]
> I think some folks objected, but si
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 27.04.2011 23:23, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging
>> package,
>> and have got to a not unreasonable point:
>>
>> logging/__init__.py 99% (96%)
>> logging/config.py 89% (85%)
>> l
On 27.04.2011 23:23, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging
> package,
> and have got to a not unreasonable point:
>
> logging/__init__.py 99% (96%)
> logging/config.py 89% (85%)
> logging/handlers.py 60% (54%)
>
> where the figures in parenth
Hi,
>> I'm at the point where to appreciably increase coverage, I'd need to write
>> some
>> test servers to exercise client code in SocketHandler, DatagramHandler and
>> HTTPHandler.
>>
>> I notice there are no utility classes in test.support to help with this kind
>> of
>> thing - would there
2011/4/27 Vinay Sajip :
> I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging
> package,
> and have got to a not unreasonable point:
>
> logging/__init__.py 99% (96%)
> logging/config.py 89% (85%)
> logging/handlers.py 60% (54%)
>
> where the figures in parentheses include branc
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:23:43 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
>
> > If you poke around in the test directory a bit, you may find there is
> > already some code along these lines in other tests (e.g. I'm pretty
> > sure the urllib tests already fire up a local ser
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:23:43 + (UTC)
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
>
> > If you poke around in the test directory a bit, you may find there is
> > already some code along these lines in other tests (e.g. I'm pretty
> > sure the urllib tests already fire up a local ser
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> If you poke around in the test directory a bit, you may find there is
> already some code along these lines in other tests (e.g. I'm pretty
> sure the urllib tests already fire up a local server). Starting down
> the path of standardisation of that test functiona
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging
> package,
> and have got to a not unreasonable point:
>
> logging/__init__.py 99% (96%)
> logging/config.py 89% (85%)
> logging/handlers.py 60% (54%)
>
> where the figures
I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging package,
and have got to a not unreasonable point:
logging/__init__.py 99% (96%)
logging/config.py 89% (85%)
logging/handlers.py 60% (54%)
where the figures in parentheses include branch coverage measurements.
I'm at the poin
15 matches
Mail list logo
