On Jan 25, 2008 10:50 PM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jameson "Chema" Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
> | on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do n
"Jameson "Chema" Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
| on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
| transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one s
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 8:13 AM, Jameson Chema Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
>> on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
>> transformations except at the reversible word level.
On Jan 25, 2008 8:13 AM, Jameson Chema Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
> on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
> transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one simple,
> avoid
On Jan 25, 2008 8:13 AM, Jameson Chema Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
> on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
> transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one simple,
> avoid
Jameson "Chema" Quinn wrote:
> I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and
> keywords on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do
> no transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one
> simple, avoidable case where this results in nonsense
On Jan 25, 2008 9:13 AM, Jameson Chema Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
> on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
> transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one simple,
> avoid
I'm writing a source code editor that translates identifiers and keywords
on-screen into a different natural language. This tool will do no
transformations except at the reversible word level. There is one simple,
avoidable case where this results in nonsense in many languages: "is not". I
propose