Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-05 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Jesse Noller writes: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull > > wrote: > >> The point of submodules a la git is subtly different.  It is that you > >> can mix and match *known versions* of the modules.  So, eg, in order

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-03 Thread Jesse Noller
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> The point of submodules a la git is subtly different.  It is that you >> can mix and match *known versions* of the modules.  So, eg, in order >> to work on recent urllib, maybe you

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-03 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:53, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > The point of submodules a la git is subtly different.  It is that you > can mix and match *known versions* of the modules.  So, eg, in order > to work on recent urllib, maybe you need a recent *but stable* email > but you don't want any of

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-03 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Brett Cannon writes: > Mercurial has subrepo support, but that doesn't justify the need to > have every module in its own repository so they can be checked out > individually. The point of submodules a la git is subtly different. It is that you can mix and match *known versions* of the module

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Holden
David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 17:17, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I planned to publish this propos

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Holden
Jesse Noller wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller: >> I am exhausted. >>> fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from "core" once >>> the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various >>>

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 17:17, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik wrote: I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and test

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 17:17, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested >>> with an assumption that Subversion repository will

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested >> with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and >> up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But r

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Jesse Noller
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller: > >>> I am exhausted. >> >> fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from "core" once >> the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various >> interpreters. I do not th

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 02.07.2010 22:01, schrieb Jesse Noller: >> I am exhausted. > > fwiw - there is a/are plan(s) to break out the stdlib from "core" once > the transition is complete, to better allow re-use between the various > interpreters. I do not think that "lots of small mirrors/repos" for > each library is

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:25, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested > with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and > up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that > currently there is no tested m

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread David Stanek
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested > with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and > up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that > currently there is no tested

Re: [Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread Jesse Noller
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested > with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and > up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that > currently there is no tested

[Python-Dev] SVN <-> HG workflow to split Python Library by Module

2010-07-02 Thread anatoly techtonik
I planned to publish this proposal when it is finally ready and tested with an assumption that Subversion repository will be online and up-to-date after Mercurial migration. But recent threads showed that currently there is no tested mechanism to sync Subversion repository back with Mercurial, so i