Am 05.12.13 16:31, schrieb Chris Angelico:
>> Ah. I don't think we have one. If somebody would want to donate one, I
>> suggest to run it in a VM, to reduce the (valid) security concerns that
>> Guido has voiced. If a snapshot of the VM is made, it would be easy to
>> restore in case a commit perfo
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>
> Can you please phrase your question more explicit? What is it that
> you want to be done before writing unit tests for the spwd module?
I am asking buildbot of Linux/Unix/BSD with root account. Do we have it now?
>
> Anybody could run
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:29 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 05.12.13 16:21, schrieb Vajrasky Kok:
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you please phrase your question more explicit? What is it that
>>> you want to be done before writing unit tests for the
Am 05.12.13 16:21, schrieb Vajrasky Kok:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>
>> Can you please phrase your question more explicit? What is it that
>> you want to be done before writing unit tests for the spwd module?
>
> I am asking buildbot of Linux/Unix/BSD with root
Am 05.12.13 02:04, schrieb Vajrasky Kok:
> Cool. What about Linux/Unix/BSD with root account? If we have
> something similar, I may plan to write unit test for spwd module.
Can you please phrase your question more explicit? What is it that
you want to be done before writing unit tests for the spwd
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
> Not helpful.
>
> I'm in meetings/training/traveling all week, but I'll get another Windows
> build slave up within the next few days. I used to have a spare desktop box
> that ran a build slave as admin so it would exercise the os.symlink cod
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> Just don't run it on Windows...
>
Not helpful.
I'm in meetings/training/traveling all week, but I'll get another Windows
build slave up within the next few days. I used to have a spare desktop box
that ran a build slave as admin so it would
Just don't run it on Windows...
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
>
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mai
On 03Dec2013 08:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
Or even just a badly framed clean-up-temp-files step.
--
Cameron Simpson
manual, n.:
A unit of documentation. There are always three or more on a given item.
One is on the she
I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-
Greetings, comrades!
Having handled these two issues personally:
http://bugs.python.org/issue19877
- test related with symlink fails on Windows Vista with administrator
account (in Windows NT 6, only account in administrator group can
create symlink)
http://bugs.python.org/issue18678
- bug in spw
11 matches
Mail list logo
