14.10.13 13:07, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
Le Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:47:03 +0300,
Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
13.10.13 13:39, Christian Heimes написав(ла):
Am 13.10.2013 08:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
+1 to hashlib from me (especially since we used that as the best
available home for compare_diges
Le Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:47:03 +0300,
Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
> 13.10.13 13:39, Christian Heimes написав(ла):
> > Am 13.10.2013 08:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> >> +1 to hashlib from me (especially since we used that as the best
> >> available home for compare_digest).
> >
> > I'm afraid your memor
13.10.13 13:39, Christian Heimes написав(ла):
Am 13.10.2013 08:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
+1 to hashlib from me (especially since we used that as the best
available home for compare_digest).
I'm afraid your memory doesn't serve you well. :(
compare_digest is implemented in _operator.c. Its offi
On 13 October 2013 20:39, Christian Heimes wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am 13.10.2013 08:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
>> +1 to hashlib from me (especially since we used that as the best
>> available home for compare_digest).
>
> I'm afraid your memory doesn't serve y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.10.2013 08:32, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> +1 to hashlib from me (especially since we used that as the best
> available home for compare_digest).
I'm afraid your memory doesn't serve you well. :(
compare_digest is implemented in _operator.c. Its
On 13 Oct 2013 06:34, "Brett Cannon" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Christian Heimes
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have written a interface to OpenSSL's PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. It
>> implements PKCS#5's password based key derivation function 2 with HMAC
>> as pseudo-random fun
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 12.10.2013 23:04, schrieb Gregory P. Smith:
> > agreed with any of these three.
>
> I'm going for hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac() for now. Right now it's just one
> function. We can always add a new module for a high level interface later.
>
> >
Am 12.10.2013 23:04, schrieb Gregory P. Smith:
> agreed with any of these three.
I'm going for hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac() for now. Right now it's just one
function. We can always add a new module for a high level interface later.
> that also makes sense...
>
> I'd leave hmac.py around through at leas
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 12.10.2013 19:37, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> > On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:19:44 +0200
> > Christian Heimes wrote:
>
...
> >> * add PBKDF2 to ``hashlib``
> >> * make ``hashlib`` a package and add PBKDF2 to a new ``hashlib.kdf``
> module
> >>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a interface to OpenSSL's PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. It
> implements PKCS#5's password based key derivation function 2 with HMAC
> as pseudo-random function. It supports any digest that is supported by
> OpenSSL, e
Am 12.10.2013 19:37, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:19:44 +0200
> Christian Heimes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have written a interface to OpenSSL's PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. It
>> implements PKCS#5's password based key derivation function 2 with HMAC
>> as pseudo-random function.
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:19:44 +0200
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a interface to OpenSSL's PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. It
> implements PKCS#5's password based key derivation function 2 with HMAC
> as pseudo-random function. It supports any digest that is supported by
> OpenSSL
Hi,
I have written a interface to OpenSSL's PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC() function. It
implements PKCS#5's password based key derivation function 2 with HMAC
as pseudo-random function. It supports any digest that is supported by
OpenSSL, e.g. SHA-1, SHA-256 and SHA-512. It's a low level inteface that
takes
13 matches
Mail list logo