Senthil Kumaran wrote:
Given these, any assumption that servers no longer support HTTP/0.9
becomes false.
But as long as httplib only sends requests with a version
number >= 1.0, it should be able to expect headers in the
response, shouldn't it?
--
Greg
___
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:30 PM, wrote:
> I doubt this makes a difference to the point being discussed, but it
> _could_. I suggest performing your tests with telnet, instead.
I received similar results using telnet earlier today.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"A storm broke loose in my
* Fred Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > I'd vote for removing it from the client code and keeping it in the
> > server.
>
> If it must be maintained anywhere, it should be in the client,
> according to the basic principle of "accept what you can, generate
> c
On 05:02 pm, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:52:14 +0800
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
Actually, it is turning out to be true:
http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc1945.html#Response
According to HTTP 1.0, When a request is Simple-Request, it means a
VERB URL (without a version)
All this talk of modern servers that also still support HTTP/0.9 is
irrelevant. Unless anybody knows of a server that *only* supports HTTP
0.9 (and that's relevant to users of httplib) let's please kill
support in the client.
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:52:14 +0800
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Actually, it is turning out to be true:
>
> http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc1945.html#Response
>
> According to HTTP 1.0, When a request is Simple-Request, it means a
> VERB URL (without a version) and it generally corresponds t
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:52:43PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
> HTTP/0.9 doesn't *have* a version string.
>
> GET /foo
>
> is a HTTP/0.9 request.
>
> GET /foo HTTP/0.9
>
> isn't actually (it's a paradoxon, alright ;). It simply isn't a valid HTTP
> request, which would demand a 505 response.
Ye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:21:37AM -0500, James Y Knight wrote:
> > Even HTTP 0.9 says that response SHOULD start with status line, but
> > gives a suggestion that clients can "tolerate" bad server server
> > behaviors when they don't send the status line and in that the case
> > response is the bo
On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Even HTTP 0.9 says that response SHOULD start with status line, but
> gives a suggestion that clients can "tolerate" bad server server
> behaviors when they don't send the status line and in that the case
> response is the body.
>
> http://ww
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:20:37PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > Try e.g. www.mozilla.org or www.google.com or www.msn.com.
> > > (but www.python.org or www.apache.org still have the legacy behaviour)
> >
> > What legacy behavior did you observe in these?
>
> -> Request:
> xyzzy
>
> -> Resp
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:52 AM, André Malo wrote:
> I'd vote for removing it from the client code and keeping it in the server.
If it must be maintained anywhere, it should be in the client,
according to the basic principle of "accept what you can, generate
carefully."
Python.org's HTTP/0.9 re
On Thursday 16 December 2010 15:23:05 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:42:08 +0100
>
> André Malo wrote:
> > * Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> > > http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:42:08 +0100
André Malo wrote:
> * Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> > http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
> > for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
> >
> > (HT
Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 16:14 +0800, Senthil Kumaran a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Well, I think the "most web servers" comment itself is outdated.
> > Try e.g. www.mozilla.org or www.google.com or www.msn.com.
> > (but www.python.org or www.apa
* Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
> for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
>
> (HTTP 1.0 was devised in 1996)
HTTP/0.9 support is still recommended (RFC
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Well, I think the "most web servers" comment itself is outdated.
> Try e.g. www.mozilla.org or www.google.com or www.msn.com.
> (but www.python.org or www.apache.org still have the legacy behaviour)
What legacy behavior did you obse
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:20:54PM -0800, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> http.server. I've opened an issue at
> http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
> f
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:20:54 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 1:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
> > Glenn Linderman wrote:
> >> On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http
On 12/15/2010 1:25 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for t
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:58:51 -0800
Glenn Linderman wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> > http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
> > for that. Would anyone think it's
On 12/15/2010 10:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
(HTTP 1.0 was devised in 1996)
Please address the following co
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
> http.server.
+1
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Hello,
I would like to remove HTTP 0.9 support from http.client and
http.server. I've opened an issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue10711
for that. Would anyone think it's a bad idea?
(HTTP 1.0 was devised in 1996)
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev
23 matches
Mail list logo
