On 10/11/2010 07:27 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
This is almost certainly failing because the directory containing the
spyderlib package isn't on sys.path anywhere (instead, whichever
d
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> This is almost certainly failing because the directory containing the
>> spyderlib package isn't on sys.path anywhere (instead, whichever
>> directory contains the script you execut
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:54:20 +0300, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
> > (The explanation of the failures applies for all Python versions that
> > I am aware of, but the -m based fix only became available in 2.6)
> > (The impact of various command line options and the PYTHONPATH
> > environment varia
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
>> Python 3k or
>> we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
This is The question. Is Python 3k more friendly to users or require
them to learn the "zen of import" (whi
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
>> Python 3k or we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
>>
>> My user story:
...
>> PEP 328 http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/ proposes:
>>
>> from ... import c
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
> Python 3k or
> we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
>
> My user story:
> I am currently debugging project, which consists of many modules in one
> pack
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> What you read as a bug report was labeled "user story",
> which I think is anatoly's way of saying "it's not a bug
> report".
Skimming the original post, I actually thought of two possible
candidates that fit the "it doesn't work" monike
> Also, it's a horrible bug report, if that's what it is.
It's not a bug report, and I don't think it was meant to be
one. It started with "I wonder if", suggesting that it is
really a request for help.
What you read as a bug report was labeled "user story",
which I think is anatoly's way of sayi
On 9/25/2010 9:15 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
from ... import config
from ..utils.qthelpers import translate, add_actions, create_action
But this doesn't work, and I couldn't find any short user level
explanation why it is
not possible to make this work at least in Py3k without additional magic
Am 25.09.2010 15:15, schrieb anatoly techtonik:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
> Python 3k or we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
>
> My user story:
> I am currently debugging project, which consists of many modules in one
> package.
> Each m
Hi,
I wonder if situation with relative imports in packages is improved in
Python 3k or
we are still doomed to a chain of hacks?
My user story:
I am currently debugging project, which consists of many modules in one package.
Each module has tests or other useful stuff for debug in its main
sectio
11 matches
Mail list logo