Zitat von Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How about changing it to tack on a "(guess)" instead of just deleting it?
I think it would be confusing to users. Currently, the only version
you would get into the database is 2.5, as earlier versions don't
have the upload command. So we would have all
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 18:29, Jim Jewett wrote:
> > This is distinct from the version of Python used to build a
> > distribution.
>
> In theory, yes.
>
> My suspicion is that if people are using the defaults, then they are
> probably also using a python version that they have tested with -
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:00:50 -0500, "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2005 16:09, Jim Jewett wrote:
> > Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
> > extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
> > Source code t
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 16:09, Jim Jewett wrote:
> Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
> extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
>
> Source code that uses @decoration won't work in python 1.5
This is distinct from the version of Python
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:32:46 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don't set the Python version for sdist uploads.
Why not? I realize that version is more important for pre-compiled
extension modules, but it applies even to a pure python package.
Source code that uses @decoration won't work in pyth
