"Gregory P. Smith" wrote:
> I don't quite like the module name 'hashes' that i chose for the
> generic interface (too close to the builtin hash() function). Other
> suggestions on a module name? 'digest' comes to mind.
hashtools, hashlib, and _hash are common names for helper modules like this.
David Ascher wrote:
FWIW, I agree. Personnally, I think that if Debian has a problem with
the above, it's their problem to deal with, not Python's.
The OSI may also have a problem with the license if they were to be made
aware of it.
See section 8 of the Open Source Definition:
"""8. License Mus
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005, Terry Reedy wrote:
> ""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib.html
>
> After reading this page and pages linked thereto, I get the impression that
> you are only asking for contributor forms fr
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:54:27PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Are there any potential problems with making the md5sum module availability
"optional" in the same way as this?
The md5 module has been a standard module for a long time; making it
optional in the next version of
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib.html
After reading this page and pages linked thereto, I get the impression that
you are only asking for contributor forms from contributors of original
material (such as module
