I did a quick hack up of letting configs control what command line options
were available. I'm not sure y'all wanted it but here it is. I'm happy to
take suggestions including tossing the whole thing and chalking it up to
experience.
It's lightly tested with the syslog implementation from the spy
On 11/21/2019 4:46 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
(though some won't be raised until 3.8.1... we should probably mark
those, or at least update that page to warn that events may have been
added over time).
I included this in a new audit doc issue.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38892
--
Terry Jan Reedy
On 21Nov2019 1337, Jason Killen wrote:
I'm good, not discouraged. Thank you for the explanation I've got my
bearings now. I will try and figure out what's missing with the new
config system. If you have tips or reading material or anything else I
should know just send it on otherwise I'll st
I'm good, not discouraged. Thank you for the explanation I've got my
bearings now. I will try and figure out what's missing with the new config
system. If you have tips or reading material or anything else I should
know just send it on otherwise I'll start googling.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:30
On 21/11/2019 21.19, Jason Killen wrote:
> I knew the audit hooks were new but didn't realize they were quite that
> new. I didn't mean to come across as pejorative asking if people cared
> about this. The fact that I had trouble finding more information made
> me think this good stuff had been l
I knew the audit hooks were new but didn't realize they were quite that
new. I didn't mean to come across as pejorative asking if people cared
about this. The fact that I had trouble finding more information made me
think this good stuff had been left by the wayside. It's new, I'll to pump
the b
On 21/11/2019 18.27, Jason Killen wrote:
> I sent in a couple of PRs, accepted and merged (Thanks!), lately that
> switch to using io.open_code when appropriate. In the process of making
> those PRs I spent a bit of time reading the two related PEPs. In
> PEP-551 there's a suggestion that people
Thanks. Yea if you bring all the backchannels together at some point I
would like to be included mostly as a listener. I totally agree about not
wanting people to think we've "solved" security. I expected that might be
the reason this hadn't been done. On the other hand I think some sort of
sta
On 21Nov2019 0927, Jason Killen wrote:
I sent in a couple of PRs, accepted and merged (Thanks!), lately that
switch to using io.open_code when appropriate. In the process of making
those PRs I spent a bit of time reading the two related PEPs. In
PEP-551 there's a suggestion that people use a
