On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 20:39, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 09:00, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > For pre-PEPs, the approach I now like is to make a local PR in my *fork* of
> > the PEPs repo. Then I'll only change it into a PR against the main repo
> > when it's time to assign a PEP number
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 09:00, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On Sat., 7 Dec. 2019, 2:08 am Victor Stinner, wrote:
>>
>> Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 16:00, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
>> > Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps tracker, period.
>> > That repo's tracker is only meant to handle ma
On Sat., 7 Dec. 2019, 2:08 am Victor Stinner, wrote:
> Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 16:00, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> > Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps tracker, period.
> That repo's tracker is only meant to handle markup and grammar.
>
> I recall that some PEPs have been discus
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 16:00, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org a écrit :
> > Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps
> > tracker, period. That repo's tracker is only meant to handle markup and
> > grammar.
> > I recall that some PEPs have been discussed in len
Le ven. 6 déc. 2019 à 16:00, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps tracker, period. That
> repo's tracker is only meant to handle markup and grammar.
I recall that some PEPs have been discussed in length in GitHub PRs.
But I'm fine with keeping the di
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps tracker, period. That
> repo's tracker is only meant to handle markup and grammar.
>
> But if you want to prevent a PR from being merged, in general you should put
> [WIP] in the subj
Let's try to avoid having PEP discussions in the peps tracker, period. That
repo's tracker is only meant to handle markup and grammar.
But if you want to prevent a PR from being merged, in general you should
put [WIP] in the subject.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 06:21 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Le mer. 4 déc. 2019 à 00:58, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
>
> At the Steering Council’s November 12th meeting, we unanimously agreed to
> reject PEPs 606 and 608:
>
> * 606 - Python Compatibility Version
> (...)
> It was our opinion that neither PEP will effectively improve compatibility as
> pro
