I replied at
https://discuss.python.org/t/rfc-pep-608-coordinated-python-release/2539/9
I would prefer to not split the discussion. I understood that
discuss.python.org is now preferred to discuss PEPs. And I don't want
to discuss here where PEPs should be discussed :-)
Victor
Le ven. 25 oct. 2
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 16:16, Freddy Rietdijk wrote:
>
> I think it is more important to have CI that clearly shows the impact of dev
> versions of the interpreter and core packages. Some of us in the Nixpkgs
> community had this idea for Python core packages as well (and potentially
> scientif
I think it is more important to have CI that clearly shows the impact of
dev versions of the interpreter and core packages. Some of us in the
Nixpkgs community had this idea for Python core packages as well (and
potentially scientific computing packages, but that's out of scope here).
This would ne
On 10/25/2019 07:25 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
I just posted a new PEP for comments, please reply there, rather than by email:
https://discuss.python.org/t/rfc-pep-608-coordinated-python-release/2539
PEP 608: Coordinated Python release
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0608/
Abstract:
Block
