On 10/26/2020 11:42 AM, Matti Picus wrote:
On 10/21/20 2:38 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
[0] https://speed.pypy.org/comparison/
Just as a follow up: the front page of speed.pypy.org now shows the
latest pypy 3.6 vs cpython 3.6.7.
I just clicked the link and there is 3.7.6, not 3.6.7. But why
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:42 AM Matti Picus wrote:
>
>
> On 10/21/20 2:38 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
> > On 10/21/20 20:42:02 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> >> When I go looking for PyPy performance stats, everything seems to be
> >> Python 2.7. Is there anywhere that compares PyPy3 to CPython 3.6
On 10/21/20 2:38 PM, Matti Picus wrote:
On 10/21/20 20:42:02 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote:
When I go looking for PyPy performance stats, everything seems to be
Python 2.7. Is there anywhere that compares PyPy3 to CPython 3.6 (or
whichever specific version)? Or maybe it's right there on
https://s
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:48:59 +1100
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> SQLAlchemy seems to be slower, but if you're using SQLAlchemy, you're
>> probably more concerned about database performance than the CPU cost
>> inside Python.
>
> I certainly wouldn't say that. The ORM's
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:48:59 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Ah, cool, got it - thanks! My reading of this is that a good few of
> the benchmarks are coming out firmly in PyPy's favour, but a number of
> them are still in CPython's favour (including "telco" where PyPy is
> staggeringly worse for
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:38 PM Matti Picus wrote:
>
> On 10/21/20 20:42:02 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > When I go looking for PyPy performance stats, everything seems to be
> > Python 2.7. Is there anywhere that compares PyPy3 to CPython 3.6 (or
> > whichever specific version)? Or maybe it'
