Mark Shannon wrote:
> In future, could you avoid editing emails when replying to them?
> A lot of context can get lost.
I'll add another voice to Ethan's saying that I appreciate having as much as
possible trimmed.
As long as people are arguing in good faith (and I assume that they are here),
On 07/14/2020 11:05 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
On 14/07/2020 5:25 pm, Tobias Kohn wrote:
On 07/14/2020, Mark Shannon wrote:
In future, could you avoid editing emails when replying to them?
A lot of context can get lost.
I appreciate posters who take the time to trim the parts of an email that
Hi Tobias,
In future, could you avoid editing emails when replying to them?
A lot of context can get lost.
On 14/07/2020 5:25 pm, Tobias Kohn wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your message. I might be able to answer some of the
questions and also address some issues with the underlying assumptio
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your message. I might be able to answer some of the
questions and also address some issues with the underlying assumptions
in your email---after all, we would most certainly want to avoid
discussing and reasoning about straw men, as you yourself have
repeatedly poi
Hi,
As I wrote in an earlier email:
For a PEP to succeed it needs to show two things.
1. Exactly what problem is being solved, or need is to be fulfilled, and that
is a sufficiently large problem, or need, to merit the proposed change.
2. That the proposed change is the best known solution
