[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

On 06.06.19 21:27, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 12:25 AM Christian Tismer > wrote: > > On 05.06.19 02:21, Victor Stinner wrote: > > So what is happening for this PEP since Python 3.8 beta1 has been > > released? Is it too late for Pyt

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 12:25 AM Christian Tismer wrote: > On 05.06.19 02:21, Victor Stinner wrote: > > So what is happening for this PEP since Python 3.8 beta1 has been > > released? Is it too late for Python 3.8 or not? > > > > It seems like most people are confused by the intent of the PEP. IMH

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

On 04Jun2019 1721, Victor Stinner wrote: So what is happening for this PEP since Python 3.8 beta1 has been released? Is it too late for Python 3.8 or not? It seems like most people are confused by the intent of the PEP. IMHO it would be better to rewrite "Remove packages from the stdlib" as "Mov

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

On 05.06.19 02:21, Victor Stinner wrote: > So what is happening for this PEP since Python 3.8 beta1 has been > released? Is it too late for Python 3.8 or not? > > It seems like most people are confused by the intent of the PEP. IMHO > it would be better to rewrite "Remove packages from the stdlib"

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

Perhaps if PEP 594 is seen to be moving ahead towards a slimmer Python (4?) stdlib, it might encourage the development of a PEP to take over maintenance of dead parrots. They might be recruited by the offer of some way to at least publish a supported bundle via the same (python.org) site that Pytho

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 594: update 1

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:22 PM Victor Stinner wrote: > So what is happening for this PEP since Python 3.8 beta1 has been > released? Is it too late for Python 3.8 or not? > > It seems like most people are confused by the intent of the PEP. IMHO > it would be better to rewrite "Remove packages fro