Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, while looking at patches I noticed 1077106. It doesn't apply to
> me - I don't use Linux - but it looks like this may have simply been
> forgotten. The last comment is in December from from Michael Hudson,
> saying in effect "I'll commit this tomorrow
Paul Moore wrote:
OK, I reviewed some bugs. Could I ask that someone review 941881
(Martin would be ideal, as he knows the Windows build process -
1006948 should probably be included as well).
Thanks for the reviews. I won't be available next week to look into
the PEP, but I promise to do so some t
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:49:48 +, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the subject of "things everyone ends up rewriting", what needs to
> be done to restart discussion on PEP 309 (Partial Function
> Application)? The PEP is marked "Accepted" and various patches exist:
>
> 941881 - C impl
