Thanks for picking this back up!
The deferral section can go away now that you're actively working on it
again, and +1 from me on the resolution of the previously open questions
(although I wouldn't be particularly upset if the SC considered bchr
redundant, given that "bchr = bytes.fromord" is a t
On 4/13/21 3:01 PM, Jelle Zijlstra wrote:
Thanks for this PEP! Most of these proposals would make for useful improvements to the language. I have a few pieces of
feedback below.
El mar, 13 abr 2021 a las 14:14, Ethan Furman escribió:
This PEP has been deferred until Python 3.9 at the earl
Thanks for this PEP! Most of these proposals would make for useful
improvements to the language. I have a few pieces of feedback below.
El mar, 13 abr 2021 a las 14:14, Ethan Furman ()
escribió:
> This PEP has been deferred until Python 3.9 at the earliest, as the open
>
This should be 3.10 at le
