Hi Fabio,
On 17/02/2022 7:30 pm, Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
Em qui., 17 de fev. de 2022 às 16:05, Mark Shannon mailto:m...@hotpy.org>> escreveu:
Hi Fabio,
This happened as part of implementing PEP 626.
The previous behavior isn't very robust w.r.t doc strings and
compiler optimizat
Em qui., 17 de fev. de 2022 às 17:55, Gabriele
escreveu:
> Hi Fabio
>
> Does the actual function object get re-created as well during the
> recompilation process that you have described? Perhaps it might help
> to note that the __code__ attribute of a function object f can be
> mutated and that f
Hi Fabio
Does the actual function object get re-created as well during the
recompilation process that you have described? Perhaps it might help
to note that the __code__ attribute of a function object f can be
mutated and that f is hashable?
Cheers,
Gabriele
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 19:33, Fabio Z
Em qui., 17 de fev. de 2022 às 16:05, Mark Shannon
escreveu:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> This happened as part of implementing PEP 626.
> The previous behavior isn't very robust w.r.t doc strings and
> compiler optimizations.
>
> OOI, why would you want to revert to the old behavior?
>
>
Hi Mark,
The issue
Hi Fabio,
This happened as part of implementing PEP 626.
The previous behavior isn't very robust w.r.t doc strings and
compiler optimizations.
OOI, why would you want to revert to the old behavior?
Cheers,
Mark.
On 17/02/2022 5:52 pm, Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
Hi all,
I'm stumbling with an issue
