Thanks, Mark. Responses are in-line below.
-eric
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:08 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
> You can already do CSP with multiprocessing, plus you get true parallelism.
> The question the PEP needs to answer is "what do sub-interpreters offer
> that other forms of concurrency don't of
Hi,
On 29/04/2020 4:02 am, Eric Snow wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to be
accepted in its current form.
Yay(ish)! :)
My main objection is that without per-subinterpeter GILs (SILs?) PEP 554
provi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:40 PM Kyle Stanley wrote:
> If there's not an implementation detail that makes this impractical,
> I'd like to give my +1 on the `Interpreter.run()` method returning
> values. From a usability perspective, it seems incredibly convenient
> to have the ability to call a fun
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
> I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to be
> accepted in its current form.
Yay(ish)! :)
> My main objection is that without per-subinterpeter GILs (SILs?) PEP 554
> provides no value over threading or multi-proce
Mark Shannon wrote:
> If `run()` can raise
> an exception, why not let it return values?
If there's not an implementation detail that makes this impractical,
I'd like to give my +1 on the `Interpreter.run()` method returning
values. From a usability perspective, it seems incredibly convenient
to h
On 22/04/2020 19:40, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 4/21/20 12:32 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to
be accepted in its current form.
BTW, thanks for including the name of the PEP in the subject. As a
casual reader of this list, i
On 4/21/20 12:32 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Hi,
I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to
be accepted in its current form.
BTW, thanks for including the name of the PEP in the subject. As a
casual reader of this list, it's very helpful to have more than just the
n
FYI, I'm not ignoring you. :) Life intervened. I'll respond in the
next day or two.
-eric
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:42 AM Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm generally in favour of PEP 554, but I don't think it is ready to be
> accepted in its current form.
>
> My main objection is that witho
