On Sat., 2 Nov. 2019, 7:05 am Antoine Pitrou, wrote:
>
> Did you weigh PEP 602 against PEP 605? Is there a summary of the
> strong points you found for each and how you decided for the former?
>
The summary in PEP 607 was accepted as making a convincing case against the
status quo.
For the com
Did you weigh PEP 602 against PEP 605? Is there a summary of the
strong points you found for each and how you decided for the former?
Thank you
Antoine.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 19:26:35 -
"Brett Cannon" wrote:
> On behalf of the steering council I am happy to announce that as
> BDFL-Delegat
On Fri., 1 Nov. 2019, 4:15 am Mats Wichmann, wrote:
> Just slightly off topic (sorry Brett), but I have past experience with
> the effort to try and sync the release cycle of something significant
> with that of major distros - and it's just too hard. (What are major
> "the major distros" anyway?
On 10/30/19 4:20 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa wrote:
Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of Python release management
with Fedora. They've been historically very helpful in early finding
regressions not only in core Python but also in third-part
On 30.10.19 22:22, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 30, 2019, at 12:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.10.19 20:26, Brett Cannon wrote:
This was discussed on https://discuss.python.org
I appreciate that you are informing the python-dev ML. However this discussion
was never announced on the ML. I a
On Thu., 31 Oct. 2019, 8:30 am Brett Cannon, wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl
> > wrote:
> > > Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of
> > > Python release management with Fedora. They've been historically very
> helpful in early
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl
> wrote:
> > Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of
> > Python release management with Fedora. They've been historically very
> > helpful in early
> > finding regressions not only in core Python but also in t
On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa wrote:
>
> Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of Python release management
> with Fedora. They've been historically very helpful in early finding
> regressions not only in core Python but also in third-party libraries,
> helping moving the c
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 20:26, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On behalf of the steering council I am happy to announce that as
> BDFL-Delegate I am accepting PEP 602 to move us to an annual release schedule
> (gated on a planned update; see below).
Thank you, I'm excited!
Nit:
> * 3 months for betas
On Oct 30, 2019, at 12:50, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 30.10.19 20:26, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> This was discussed on https://discuss.python.org
>
> I appreciate that you are informing the python-dev ML. However this
> discussion was never announced on the ML. I assume this is a kind of thing
This PEP was mentioned on python-dev at least at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/WQ64ZGBECFDIRO6DS7JN3NALYDJGPAAE/
and
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/YVSOOFLCBHPIA3HBL4L2BFBJENVHZDJC/.
This was also covered by the PEP 596
On 30.10.19 20:26, Brett Cannon wrote:
This was discussed on https://discuss.python.org
I appreciate that you are informing the python-dev ML. However this discussion
was never announced on the ML. I assume this is a kind of thing that makes the
ML obsolete and forces everyone into discourse
12 matches
Mail list logo
