On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Martin (gzlist)
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>>
>> On 30/12/2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> but maybe a
>> discussion could start about a new, less hacky, way of doing the same
>>
>
> I am
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Martin (gzlist) wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> On 30/12/2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> When I made that change, I didn't know that the __unittest "hack" was
>> being used elsewhere outside of unittest, so I felt fine replacing it
>> with anothe
Thanks for the quick response.
On 30/12/2009, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
> When I made that change, I didn't know that the __unittest "hack" was
> being used elsewhere outside of unittest, so I felt fine replacing it
> with another. While I still consider it an implementation detail, I
> would be
Olemis Lang wrote:
> PS: `assertRaises` context managers are great !!! BTW
> ;o)
The detailed comparison methods added for 2.7 are really nice too. It's
great getting error messages that tell me what I broke rather than "you
broke it!" :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com
2009/12/30 Olemis Lang :
> Hmmm ... One of the issues I didn't notice ...
>
> IMO +1 for leaving it as it was before (i.e. __unittest) because :
>
> - the double underscore should mean (CMIIW) that it's an implementation
> detail
> - not few libs use that name already ;o)
>
> +0.5 for adding `__
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2009/12/30 Martin (gzlist) :
>> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Hi!
>
>> In rev 74094 of Python, you split the unittest module up,
+1
>> could you
>> point me at any bug entries or discussion over this revision so I can
>> catch up?
>
> This was mostl
2009/12/30 Martin (gzlist) :
> Hi Benjamin,
Hi!
>
> In rev 74094 of Python, you split the unittest module up, could you
> point me at any bug entries or discussion over this revision so I can
> catch up?
This was mostly a discussion on IRC between Michael Foord and myself.
>
> As a side-effect
