Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Cameron Laird schrieb:
>> Folklore that I remember so unreliably I avoid trying to repeat it here
>> held that Python threading had problems on BSD and allied Unixes. What's
>> the status of this?
>
> The problem that people run into again and again is the stack size. The
Cameron Laird schrieb:
> Folklore that I remember so unreliably I avoid trying to repeat it here
> held that Python threading had problems on BSD and allied Unixes. What's
> the status of this?
The problem that people run into again and again is the stack size. The
BSDs allow for so little stack
Cameron Laird wrote:
> Folklore that I remember so unreliably I avoid trying to repeat it here
> held that Python threading had problems on BSD and allied Unixes. What's
> the status of this? I suspect the answer is, "Everything works, and the
> only real problem ever was that *signals* have diff
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:08:37PM +, Cameron Laird wrote:
> Folklore that I remember so unreliably I avoid trying to repeat it here
> held that Python threading had problems on BSD and allied Unixes. What's
> the status of this? I suspect the answer is, "Everything works, and the
> only real
Folklore that I remember so unreliably I avoid trying to repeat it here
held that Python threading had problems on BSD and allied Unixes. What's
the status of this? I suspect the answer is, "Everything works, and the
only real problem ever was that *signals* have different semantics under
Linux a
