> Perhaps the renaming should be more radical, to indicate the extent of
> the change.
Another possiblity would be to use the new name to indicate a position
in a spectrum of programming languages. For instance, "beryl",
"topaz", "steel" and "jade" are (on the Mohs scale) all sturdier than
pearl
> perhaps the Python 3 executable should have a different name as part
> of the standard distribution? I suggest "py" / "py.exe"
Perhaps the renaming should be more radical, to indicate the extent of
the change.
I suggest "second", to commemorate "Second City" in Chicago, another
famous comedy tr
On 9/11/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> But just installing python3.0 as python and expecting
> nothing will break is not a goal -- it would be too constraining.
It should be expected that many users will keep both 2.x and 3 side by
side for quite a long time. Instead of havi
