"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Trent Nelson:
>>
>>> I ended up playing around with Profile Guided Optimization, running
>>> ``python.exe pystones.py'' to collect call-graph
"Greg Ewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe Smith wrote:
>
>> Microsoft as a general rule, does not go after people distributing
>> products
>> that Microsoft has labeled
>> free, even after Microsoft no longer distributes that product.
>
> But if the licence a
Joe Smith wrote:
> Microsoft as a general rule, does not go after people distributing products
> that Microsoft has labeled
> free, even after Microsoft no longer distributes that product.
But if the licence agreement technically forbids
redistribution, it doesn't seem like a good idea
to rely o
Joe Smith wrote:
> Microsoft as a general rule, does not go after people distributing
> products that Microsoft has labeled free, even after Microsoft no
> longer distributes that product. So the express editions will
> continue to be available long into the future if 2005+1 does not have
> a free
"Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Trent Nelson:
>
>> I ended up playing around with Profile Guided Optimization, running
>> ``python.exe pystones.py'' to collect call-graph data after
>> python.exe/Python24.dll had been instrumented, then recompiling wit
"James Y Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 23, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>> I think Martin decided to keep VC71 (Visual Studio .NET 2003) for
>> another
>> release cycle. Given the impressive results of VC8 with PGO, and
>> the fact
>> that
Trent Nelson:
> I ended up playing around with Profile Guided Optimization, running
> ``python.exe pystones.py'' to collect call-graph data after
> python.exe/Python24.dll had been instrumented, then recompiling with the
> optimizations fed back in.
It'd be an idea to build a larger body of Py
"Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> that Visual Studio Express 2005 is free forever, I would hope as well for
> the decision to be reconsidered.
But is it freely redistributable forever? Or even now? I have the 2003
toolkit sitting on my disk, but I a
On Jul 23, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> I think Martin decided to keep VC71 (Visual Studio .NET 2003) for
> another
> release cycle. Given the impressive results of VC8 with PGO, and
> the fact
> that Visual Studio Express 2005 is free forever, I would hope as
> well for
> the dec
Trent Nelson wrote:
> Has anyone else built Python with Visual Studio 2005 and played around
> with Profile Guided Optimization?
Yes, there was some work at the recent Need for Speed sprint. Python 2.5 has
a PCBuild8 directory (for VS 2005) with a specific project for PGO.
> Results were interes
Hi,
Has anyone else built Python with Visual Studio 2005 and played around
with Profile Guided Optimization? I had to build Python from source w/
VS 2005 as I had a few .pyd's built with VS 2005 that I wanted to load;
I ended up playing around with Profile Guided Optimization, running
``python.ex
11 matches
Mail list logo
