On Sunday 07 August 2005 22:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I think the INCREFs don't need to be documented because you don't have
> to worry about them -- they follow the normal pattern of reference
> counts: if you owned an object before passing it to PyTuple_Pack(),
> you still own it afterwar
> According to the source code, PyTuple_Pack returns a new reference (it
> calls PyTuple_New). It also Py_INCREF's all the objects in the new
> tuple. Is this unusual behavior?
No. That is how containers work. Look at PyBuild_Value() for
comparison.
> None of these added references are doc
On 8/7/05, Edward C. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the source code, PyTuple_Pack returns a new reference (it
> calls PyTuple_New). It also Py_INCREF's all the objects in the new
> tuple. Is this unusual behavior? None of these added references are
> documented in the API Reference
According to the source code, PyTuple_Pack returns a new reference (it
calls PyTuple_New). It also Py_INCREF's all the objects in the new
tuple. Is this unusual behavior? None of these added references are
documented in the API Reference Manual.
___
Py
