Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 22:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> 1. Finishing the __module_name__ workaround to allow relative
>> imports from the main module when using -m.
>
> I have some nervousness about this. Are there cases in the stdlib
> where this is an issue, today? Are the
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 22:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 1. Finishing the __module_name__ workaround to allow relative
> imports from the main module when using -m.
>
>I'd really like to finish this, because having PEP 328 and 338
> not playing well together is a wart that's quite visible to end
>
I've got a couple of changes ready to go for beta 2, but need a go ahead from
one of the release managers before committing either of them:
1. Finishing the __module_name__ workaround to allow relative imports from the
main module when using -m.
I'd really like to finish this, because having
