On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:46 +0200
DasIch wrote:
> Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
> allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
> which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
> future.
"Including" is quite vagu
DasIch wrote:
> Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
> allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
> which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
> future.
>
> This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results fro
Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
future.
This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results from this
particular benchmar
On 29/04/2011 11:04, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Mark Shannon wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel
wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in t
Mark Shannon wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel
>> wrote:
>>> M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
>> the CPython
>> benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
>
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. The
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
>>
>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>
>>> DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
>>>
>>> Try not to care too much about p
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but
some of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
>> the CPython
>> benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
>> package
>
> Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but
> some of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's interpreter
> behavio
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but some
of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's interpreter behaviour.
For example, the benchmarks for
Hello,
As announced in my GSoC proposal I'd like to announce which benchmarks
I'll use for the benchmark suite I will work on this summer.
As of now there are two benchmark suites (that I know of) which
receive some sort of attention, those are the ones developed as part
of the PyPy project[1] whi
11 matches
Mail list logo
