On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:21:01AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > I just came across a code snippet that
> > would define a method with the "__dict__" name - like in:
> >
> > class A:
> > def __dict__(self):
> > return ()
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 at 05:09 Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:21:01AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > I just came across a code snippet that
> > would define a method with the "__dict__" name - like in:
> >
> > class A:
> > def __dict__(self):
> > return ()
>
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:21:01AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> I just came across a code snippet that
> would define a method with the "__dict__" name - like in:
>
> class A:
> def __dict__(self):
> return ()
That's a strange thing to do, but I don't think it ought to be illega
I just came across a code snippet that
would define a method with the "__dict__" name - like in:
class A:
def __dict__(self):
return ()
The resulting class's instances can be assigned
dynamic attributes as usual, but one can never acess
its actual local variables through instance.__
