Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Jeremy Hylton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 29 conflicts > > Oh. That's not as bad as I expected. Proceeding >> Major conflict: >> Python/compile.c(Probably not merged during 1st merge) > > I think that's right. I didn't merge any of the changes, then. > >> Lib/test/test_c

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:20:51 -0500, Kurt B. Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Hylton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Does anyone want to volunteer to integrate the current head to the > > branch? I think that's a pretty important near-term step. > > I'll take a shot at it. Great! I

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:28:11 -0500, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be helpful for me to move the peepholer out of compile.c into a > separate source file? It doesn't really matter. There are two reasons. 1) We've been working on the new compiler code in newcompile.c, rath

RE: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Would it be helpful for me to move the peepholer out of compile.c into a separate source file? Raymond Hettinger ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/m

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Jeremy Hylton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone want to volunteer to integrate the current head to the > branch? I think that's a pretty important near-term step. I'll take a shot at it. I see the following: 2216 changes: 1428 modifications w/o confict 399 adds 360 removes 29 conflict

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:32:44 +0900, Jiwon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to help here on the AST branch, if it's not too late. > (Especially I'm interested with the generator expression part.) Great! It's not too late. > If I want to volunteer, do I just begin to work with it? Or do I

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

I'd like to help here on the AST branch, if it's not too late. (Especially I'm interested with the generator expression part.) If I want to volunteer, do I just begin to work with it? Or do I need to read something or discuss with someone? Thanks. Jiwon. On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:03:33 -0500, Jerem

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On 2005 Jan 04, at 22:11, Brett C. wrote: ... Speaking for myself, I have a burning interest in the AST branch (though I can't seem to get it correctly downloaded so far, I guess it's just my usual CVS-clumsiness and I'll soon find out what I'm doing wrong & fix it) See http://www.python

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be fine with keeping this on python-dev too. Maybe tag the Subject: with [AST] when starting a thread? -- KBK ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Does anyone want to volunteer to integrate the current head to the branch? I think that's a pretty important near-term step. Jeremy ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http:/

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Jeff Epler wrote: On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:02:52PM -0800, Brett C. wrote: Although if someone can start sooner than by all means, go for it! And obviously help would be great since it isn't a puny codebase (4,000 lines so far for the CST->AST and AST->bytecode code). And obviously knowing a litt

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Alex Martelli wrote: On 2005 Jan 04, at 17:17, Jeremy Hylton wrote: That's fine with me. We had taken it to the compiler-sig when it wasn't clear there was interest in the ast branch :-). Speaking for myself, I have a burning interest in the AST branch (though I can't seem to get it correctly do

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On 2005 Jan 04, at 17:17, Jeremy Hylton wrote: That's fine with me. We had taken it to the compiler-sig when it wasn't clear there was interest in the ast branch :-). Speaking for myself, I have a burning interest in the AST branch (though I can't seem to get it correctly downloaded so far, I gue

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Jan 4, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote: I was suggesting that there is an ongoing discussion that should continue on the compiler-sig. Guido> I'd be fine with keeping this on python-dev too. +1 for a number of reasons: * It's more visible and would potentially get more people in

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

>> I was suggesting that there is an ongoing discussion that should >> continue on the compiler-sig. Guido> I'd be fine with keeping this on python-dev too. +1 for a number of reasons: * It's more visible and would potentially get more people interested in what's happening

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 11:17, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > That's fine with me. We had taken it to the compiler-sig when it > wasn't clear there was interest in the ast branch :-). Ok, then I'll leave compiler-sig where it is. -Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

That's fine with me. We had taken it to the compiler-sig when it wasn't clear there was interest in the ast branch :-). Jeremy On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:31:30 -0800, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I was suggesting that there > > is an ongoing discussion that should continue on the c

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

>I was suggesting that there > is an ongoing discussion that should continue on the compiler-sig. I'd be fine with keeping this on python-dev too. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@p

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

The list archives look like they are mostly full of spam, but it's also the only list we've used to discuss the ast work. I haven't really worried whether the sig was "active," as long as the list was around. I don't mind if you want to resurrect it. Is there some way to delete the spam from the

RE: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 23:17, Tony Meyer wrote: > > Perhaps interested parties should take up the discussion on > > the compiler-sig. > > This isn't listed in the 'currently active' SIGs list on > - is it still active, or will it now be? If so, > perhaps it should be add

RE: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

> Perhaps interested parties should take up the discussion on > the compiler-sig. This isn't listed in the 'currently active' SIGs list on - is it still active, or will it now be? If so, perhaps it should be added to the list? By 'discussion on', do you mean via the wi

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:02:52 -0800, Brett C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plus there is the running tradition of sprinting on the AST branch at PyCon. > I > was planning on shedding my bug fixing drive at PyCon this year and sprinting > with (hopefully) Jeremy, Neal, Tim, and Neil on the AST bran

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:02:52PM -0800, Brett C. wrote: > Although if someone can start sooner than by all means, go for it! > And obviously help would be great since it isn't a puny codebase > (4,000 lines so far for the CST->AST and AST->bytecode code). And obviously knowing a little more abou

Re: [Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

Guido van Rossum wrote: The AST branch has been "nearly complete" for several Python versions now. The last time a serious effort was made was in May I believe, but it wasn't enough to merge the code back into 2.4, alas. It would be a real shame if this code was abandoned. [SNIP] So, I'm pleading.

[Python-Dev] Please help complete the AST branch

The AST branch has been "nearly complete" for several Python versions now. The last time a serious effort was made was in May I believe, but it wasn't enough to merge the code back into 2.4, alas. It would be a real shame if this code was abandoned. If we're going to make progress with things like