Hi Carl,
Thanks for clarifying this.
This means that indeed we have the same goals. I'll have a closer look
at the internal pip APIs, as they are probably really useful and already
used in production environment :)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python
Hi Alexis,
On 06/20/2012 10:57 AM, Alexis Métaireau wrote:
> Le mer. 20 juin 2012 18:45:23 CEST, Paul Moore a écrit :
>> Thanks - as you say, it's not so much the actual problem as the
>> principle of what the packaging API offers that matters here. Although
>> it does make a good point - to what
On 20/06/2012 17:29, Paul Moore wrote:
I wasn't aware of this - I've had a look and my first thought is that
the documentation needs completing. At the moment, there's a lot that
isn't documented, and we should avoid getting into the same situation
as with distutils where people have to use undo
Le mer. 20 juin 2012 18:45:23 CEST, Paul Moore a écrit :
Thanks - as you say, it's not so much the actual problem as the
principle of what the packaging API offers that matters here. Although
it does make a good point - to what extent do the packaging APIs draw
on existing experience like that of
On 20 June 2012 17:07, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 06/20/2012 09:29 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> As a specific example, one thing I would like to do is to be able to
>> set up a packaging.pypi client object that lets me query and download
>> distributions. However, rather than just querying Py
Hi Paul,
On 06/20/2012 09:29 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> As a specific example, one thing I would like to do is to be able to
> set up a packaging.pypi client object that lets me query and download
> distributions. However, rather than just querying PyPI (the default)
> I'd like to be able to set up a
On 20 June 2012 14:47, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 14:16, Alexis Métaireau wrote:
>> packaging.pypi is functionally working but IMO the API can (and probably
>> should) be improved (we really lack feedback to know that).
>
> I wasn't aware of this - I've had a look and my first thought is
