Sent: 30. nóvember 2013 03:39
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Antoine Pitrou; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long histor
On 30/11/2013 03:39, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
like
it is increasingly shutting itself in.
On 30 November 2013 01:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
> have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
> like
> it is increasingly shutting itself in.
Are you sure it isn't just that th
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:25:14PM +, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote
about the PEP process:
> > > How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
> > > making things better?
> >
> > Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
> > patch to
On 29.11.2013 16:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
>>> How about acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help
>>> making things better?
>>
>> Well, how about? If Anatoly has a concrete proposal, surely he can propose a
>> patch to make things better.
>
> Which is what he did. And i
vember 2013 14:58
> > To: python-dev@python.org
> > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated
> initiatives
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
> > Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> > > Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unne
Am 29.11.2013 10:16, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
> Reading the defect, I find people being unnecessarily obstructive.
>
> Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action. How about
> acknowledging that these waters are dark and murky and help making things
> better?
>
> Surely
On 29/11/2013 15:25, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
I know that Anatoly himself is a subject of long history here, but I myself
have felt lessening affinity to the dev community in recent years. It feels
like
it is increasingly shutting itself in.
I entirely agree, the development community
on-dev@python.org
> > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
> > Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> > > Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action.
> >
> > Closi
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-Dev [mailto:python-dev-
> bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Pitrou
> Sent: 29. nóvember 2013 14:58
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiativ
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:16:38 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
> Closing the ticket, twice, is a rude, and unnecessary action.
Closing the ticket means "we don't believe there is an issue, or we
don't think it would be reasonable to fix it". If that's our judgement
on the issue, how is it rude
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> About ill fated initiatives. I don't like when people prematurely close
> tickets
> without waiting for the mutual agreement that the problem is solved. Perhaps
> trackers should have personal "agree/disagree/meh" flags to help other
>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. "Pull
> requests" (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
> start by focusing on the contents, and the mechanics of editing it and
> getting it fo
: python-dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP process entry point and ill fated initiatives
Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. "Pull
requests" (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
start by focusing on the contents, and the me
Anatoly, the Python community is a lot more diverse than you think. "Pull
requests" (whatever that means) are not the way to start a PEP. You should
start by focusing on the contents, and the mechanics of editing it and
getting it formatted properly are secondary. The process is explained in
PEP on
I wanted to help people who are trying to find out more
about PEP submission process by providing relevant
info (or a pointer) in README.rst that is located at the
root of PEPs repository. You can see it here.
https://bitbucket.org/rirror/peps
I filled this issue with b.p.o
http://bugs.python.or
16 matches
Mail list logo
