On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> I consider multiprocessing a new API -- while it bears
>> a superficial resemblance with the threading API the
>> similarities are just that, and it should not be
>> constrained by mistakes in that
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I consider multiprocessing a new API -- while it bears
> a superficial resemblance with the threading API the
> similarities are just that, and it should not be
> constrained by mistakes in that API.
The justification for including it is precisely that it is *not* a new
